Page 1 of 67 12345678910112651 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 1654

Thread: NEW! EUROSPORT Supercharger kit (Dyno)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    3,809
    My Cars
    E46 M3

    NEW! EUROSPORT Supercharger kit (Dyno)

    Josh is finally finishing up his supercharger project! It has been in the works for what seemed like forever. We were all anxious to see the results...

    Check these out.

    Specs:
    96 M3 3.2
    Supersprint exhaust
    Supercharger System
    Tuned software
    Runs at 8psi and peaks at 8.5psi

    303 ft lbs/343 rwhp on Chevron 92 octane

    *veeeerrry late edit* 'twas 91 octane, not 92.


    They are going back to the dyno to do some more tuning this and next week.

    For the short story and a link to the dyno graph follow this link:
    Eurosport Twin Screw Supercharger Kit

    They estimate the availability date to be March 2004
    Last edited by euro4life; 02-12-2004 at 07:49 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,131
    My Cars
    2003 AW/Black M3
    WOW, Verrrrrrrrrrrry interesting!
    <font face="century gothic"><b><font size="2">2003 Alpine White M3...</font></b>
    <font face="century gothic"><b><font size="1"></font></b><br />
    The infamous "Paul E." and I after some detailing...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Boise, I dA Ho
    Posts
    1,160
    My Cars
    ford truck
    : Amazing numbers... will this be CARB certified? Ballpark price?
    ford truck

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Moist and wet!!, WA/ San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    1,922
    My Cars
    04 Imola M3
    Hm...I read somewhere JConforti was working on SC kit...is this the one?
    17 Alpine White M2 Performance Edition (1 of 150), 04 Imola M3, 99 Cosmos M3, 97 Dakar M3


    Mostly stocks

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,092
    My Cars
    2011 CC 2.0t, 98 M3
    Probably a stupid question, but is this Stimpee's project??
    __________
    98 M3
    2008 G35S

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,131
    My Cars
    2003 AW/Black M3
    Well, Josh isn't Steve, so I would have to guess no! But what the hell do I know...?
    <font face="century gothic"><b><font size="2">2003 Alpine White M3...</font></b>
    <font face="century gothic"><b><font size="1"></font></b><br />
    The infamous "Paul E." and I after some detailing...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3
    That looks great! Wonder when the OBD! system is coming out...
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,092
    My Cars
    2011 CC 2.0t, 98 M3
    I only say that because I thought that there was a relationship there between the two of them. I thought that I heard that 'Stimpee's' project was going to have Jim C's software.. What the heck do I know? All I know is that the more these type of options become available to us, the more I do not want to sell my car! More competition means better prices and hopefully higher quality products based on mistakes made by other tuners. We all have got to love this stuff. I've been on the fence with this whole forced induction thing. I've prefered to put money towards a new home, business, etc.. Areas where I can actually benefit financially. Now that things are different for me, I am getting ready to take the plunge.. Bring it on tuners!! Off-topic, but has any one else heard about AA's Vortech upgrade and the possibility of there being an upgraded Rotrex unit?? Probably rumors on the Rotrex deal, but I'm still curious..
    __________
    98 M3
    2008 G35S

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,797
    My Cars
    97 M3 99 Z3M
    Things in the world of F/I for BMWs just got very interesting.... With so many options becoming available, whats a guy(or girl) to do?? That Eurosport Kit looks very interesting indeed, and since Jim C. is behind it, i'm sure it will be a quality piece. However, since Jim C's name is associated with this project, I'm sure the price won't be cheap.
    1997 M3
    1999 Z3 M Coupe - Turbocharged

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Moist and wet!!, WA/ San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    1,922
    My Cars
    04 Imola M3
    I was going to pull the trigger on the cam kit, but with this coming out....hm....
    17 Alpine White M2 Performance Edition (1 of 150), 04 Imola M3, 99 Cosmos M3, 97 Dakar M3


    Mostly stocks

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    1,817
    My Cars
    '06 RX-8, '06 MX-5, '04 GTI 1.8T
    Price?
    Thomas / 97 M3 Sedan SOLD!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    1,964
    My Cars
    E46M3 SWC, E90325 GAC, E36 ITS, 04 2500HD
    Uh, oh....I assume OBDI is gonna be available too?
    Rob Birkhead | Principal


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    329
    Originally posted by ADVANT123
    Things in the world of F/I for BMWs just got very interesting.... With so many options becoming available, whats a guy(or girl) to do?? That Eurosport Kit looks very interesting indeed, and since Jim C. is behind it, i'm sure it will be a quality piece. However, since Jim C's name is associated with this project, I'm sure the price won't be cheap.
    ADVANT123,

    Thanks for the props..

    Things I'm associated with are quality for one reason.. I don't
    GET involved with anything that I don't think IS quality.

    But please let me clear something up.

    My "involvement" with anything isn't what makes it expensive.

    My "involvement" isn't about the money.. because if it was I
    wouldn't have left my career as a computer consultant.

    What's been lost as "internet communities" now multiply is
    that for the first 3 years, my involvement was "free" to the
    car owners and funded solely by ME. People forget the BMW CCA
    functions where we "gave away" chips and tuning, generally
    for a "thank you" and sometimes for a drink at the bar.

    I guess you could say it bothers me a bit, because
    In this world you can either INNOVATE or IMITATE.

    You can either figure it out first, or wait for someone else to
    figure it out and then COPY it.

    INNOVATION costs money.

    IMITATION doesn't.

    If you look throughout industrial history, you'll see it.

    As to why INNOVATION costs money? Because the cost of
    business.. the cost of figuring something out.. comes at the
    price of the many EXPENSIVE failures that no one ever sees.

    Like the Rotrex charger we played with back in the late 90's.

    Where do you think the money for all the R&D comes from?

    It comes from a company (or in the case of the Rotrex, out of
    Josh's pocket.. and my pocket)

    We still have those chargers somewhere on a shelf, collecting
    dust and grime. Want a paperweight?

    Yet, people buy something from the copiers based upon "price".

    Hey guys, I hate to tell you.. but the copiers will always be
    cheaper than the guys who innovated the original design.

    The kicker of a question is:

    What happens one day, when the innovators get sick
    of doing things that get copied??

    Well, they stop innovating.

    They pack up their marbles and go play somewhere else.

    Let's forget the S/C for a second. Let's talk about putting M50
    manifolds on later motors... who figured out how to do it and
    still pass emissions? Who designed the plate that connects
    the emissions hoses/etc?? JOSH did.. (from Eurosport).

    The tuning on the M50 manifold/cams kit isn't just about
    "air/fuel ratios" and "power" but also driveability.. things like
    smooth idle when coldstarting and stalling when coming to
    a stop had to be handled at great use of time. I know because
    I spent a good month working it all out.

    Now suddenly, others copy the idea, but somehow the copies
    are more novel than the original.. BULL!

    Back to Supercharger kits.. not to put words into either Josh's or
    Stimpee's mouths, but both kits are novel, and both are aimed
    at different initial markets.

    Josh's kit is being setup for later OBD-II E36's.. Stimpees for
    the earlier OBD-I E36's.

    Where each of them goes from there is up to them.

    SO, who wants to make me a bet on how long it takes some
    other company to copy either Josh or Stimpee and then say
    that their product is "superior".

    I figure 12-18 months from release of the first kit.

    Jim

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Austrailia
    Posts
    1,107
    My Cars
    M6
    Um jim...can't these guys patent their designs and then make royalties off of selling their patents? If making money off your design is important, then this wouldn't pose a problem. This is assuming that you don't dislike immitators at all.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Republic of Texas Y'all
    Posts
    7,936
    My Cars
    99M3, 04 M3 , 17 F250
    Jim, I just wanted to say that your Cam kit rocks. Ive had it for a week now and the quality of all the components are rock solid.

    Thanks for brining a quality product to market in a world of crappy BMW parts.

    I look forward to seeing the new SC kit.
    Doug (BMWCCA HPDE Instructor, Respect My Authoritay!)

    1999 Titanium Silver M3 track Rat
    2017 F250 Powerstroke
    2004 M3 Widebody, LS

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    329
    Originally posted by Silex
    Um jim...can't these guys patent their designs and then make royalties off of selling their patents? If making money off your design is important, then this wouldn't pose a problem. This is assuming that you don't dislike immitators at all.
    It's a lot more complicated than that.

    Patents cost 10's of thousands just to get and sometimes
    MILLIONS to defend.

    Stimpee is correct on the S/C kits.

    Same with the manifold adapter.

    If you have a design patent, all you have to do is change
    the design and you "skirt" the patent.

    All-in-all, the US Patent system is a mess and somewhat of a
    joke among other countries.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    329
    Originally posted by CABimmer
    Jim, I just wanted to say that your Cam kit rocks. Ive had it for a week now and the quality of all the components are rock solid.

    Thanks for brining a quality product to market in a world of crappy BMW parts.

    I look forward to seeing the new SC kit.
    Thanks Doug,

    Happy owners are our best reward.

    Most of the props for the cam kit though, should go to Josh.

    I only tuned it.

    Jim
    Last edited by Jim Conforti; 10-31-2003 at 03:37 PM.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    1,081
    My Cars
    05 330i ZHP
    any pricing rumors?
    05 Black Sapphire 330i ZHP
    99 Alpine White ///M3 (traded, but not forgotten)

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    1,817
    My Cars
    '06 RX-8, '06 MX-5, '04 GTI 1.8T
    Originally posted by Jim Conforti


    Same with the manifold adapter.

    So this kit uses the stock intake manifold?
    Thomas / 97 M3 Sedan SOLD!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    329
    The supercharger?? No.. not at all.

    The CAM kit needs an adapter to allow all the emissions hoses
    from the M52/S52 to fit onto an M50/S50 manifold.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    1,817
    My Cars
    '06 RX-8, '06 MX-5, '04 GTI 1.8T
    Originally posted by Jim Conforti
    The supercharger?? No.. not at all.

    The CAM kit needs an adapter to allow all the emissions hoses
    from the M52/S52 to fit onto an M50/S50 manifold.
    OK, that make a lot more sense.
    Thomas / 97 M3 Sedan SOLD!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Markham, Ontario,Canada
    Posts
    1,726
    My Cars
    Bmw E36 330i , Mazda 3
    I like the dyno graph and power this s/c kit produces.

    Damm this s/c makes almost max torque from 3500+ and then the hp takes off on the top end.

    Very good torque even down low 2500rpm
    AA Stage 1 Gen III, BMP head gasket, Bored Throttle Body, 3.0"DnPipe & Custom exhaust with AA Gen 2, Aquamist 1s water/methanol injection,
    Last dynojet Aug 02 248c SAE 369whp/354ft-lbs at 10.5psi, 1/4mile 12.6@116mph
    New Sept 02 Head work and exhaust porting, April 04:UUC Pulleys, Turbo to intercooler pipe 2.5" Aug 04 3.5"HFM,11.5psi

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    3,644
    How about some pictures?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Bucks County, PA
    Posts
    575
    My Cars
    1998 M3/4
    Since I work at the Patent Office, I will chime in....usually you cannot get a patent by combining known elements to perform their known function. Notice I said "usually". The whole grey area of my job is in whether such a combination would be obvious (35 USC 103). Jim is correct in saying it costs thousands to get a patent and possibly millions defending/enforcing it.

    Jim - You might remember talking to me about 4 or 5 years ago at a special event that Curry's Auto Service set up...Hope things are doing well! I have your Euro HFM CAI kit and it is fantastic! Keep up the good work.

    Anyway, those dyno numbers looked SICK!! I cant' wait till this comes out. I know it's still in the development stages, but I'm curious to see an A/F graph.

    Wes
    '95 M3
    Wes

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    329
    Originally posted by stimpee
    Why do you think I have been hyping and defending this approach to the "naysayers" all along??!?!?!?!
    Steve
    Steve wasn't even hyping.

    Ask yourself this.. how many OEM's are using (insert the name
    of the centrifugal supercharger of the week here) out of the
    factory.

    The only chargers used by OEM's are positive displacement units.

    Look at the Ford Cobra, the Merc. Kompressors, etc.

    Either the eaton style "Roots" blower or the Opcon style
    "Lysholm" aka "Twin Screw" blower.

    The smart ones use a twin screw because of the efficiency.

    There is a reason for this.

    There is also a reason why most aftermarketeers are using
    the centrifugals.

    The cost of putting a centri blower on a motor is an order of
    magnitude cheaper than putting a p.d. blower. I'm talking
    the R&D of course, not the finished product MSRP.

    With a PD blower you generally need to use an air/water
    cooler and have a complete intake manifold designed.

    That's water tanks, hoses, pumps, heat exchangers/etc.

    Not to mention they are quite a bit harder to tune than a Centri.

    With a Centri, you need brackets and plumbing that in all
    reality could be whipped up in a weekend. The tuning can
    be accomplished on a dyno in a day.

    A P.D. blower is hard to fit to an engine, but the results
    speak loudly for themselves.

    Serious Torque right off idle, with no compromise in reliable
    horsepower.

    Or as I've said before.. HP doesn't win races, torque does.

Page 1 of 67 12345678910112651 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •