Hi everyone, in Bentley service manual brake rotors thickness specked to 24 mm front and 22mm rear.
Part numbers for front rotors 312X24: 34-11-8-848-417 replaces 34-11-6-774-875, 34-11-6-792-219
Part numbers for rear rotors 300X20: 34-21-6-864-900 replaces 34-21-6-792-229
But when I go shopping for genuine new rotors with correct part numbers (checked with dealer), they are listed as front 24 mm thick, and rear 20mm thick. The front matches Bentley SM spec, but the rear is not. Again, the BSM spec for the rear is 22, while the part sold specked at 20 mm thick.
Is the Bentley service manual has an error? Or what am I missing?
I checked my actual rotor thickness with calipers and got even more confused. After 5 years and 70K of the millage, two sets of pads worn, my actual rotors thickness measures as follows:
Front: 24 mm
Rear: 20 mm
Does it mean that my rotors did not wear out at all after 5y/70k? Is that possible? Or what am I missing? Could it be that dealer did not give me the correct part number? Is the F31 wagon use different rotors than F30?
I'm preparing to replace brake pads and I want to see if my rotors need to be replaced or not. But these two issues confuse me and I can't make the decision:
1) Does Bentley SM contains an error?
2) How could rotors not suffer any wear after 5y/70k
3) Brake pedal feels a bit deeper, is that due to pads wear?
4) Do I need to replace rotors at this point? They do not produce any vibration at this point.
I would appreciate any input!
1. Bentley is not the definitive voice in car repair, as they're simply a 3rd party. They do have mistakes. Often they're good for general reference, or as a door stop.
2. Yes, this is possible. But if you see a lip on them or cracks/uneven surface, heavy rust... replace them anyways.
3. Yes, pedal is deeper due to pads being thin. Also, you should be flushing brake fluid every 2 years. It greatly increases the feel of the pedal.
4. See #2. I would if you can.
Straight from BMW for the base brake system (not multi piston):
Fronts:
Nominal size (diameter x thickness) 312x24mm
(MIN TH) is stamped in brake disc chamber 22.4mm
Rears:
Nominal size (diameter x thickness) 300x20mm
(MIN TH) is stamped in brake disc chamber 18.4mm
-Abel
- E36 328is ~210-220whp: Lots of Mods.
- 2000 Z3: Many Mods.
- 2003 VW Jetta TDI Manual 47-50mpg
- 1999 S52 Estoril M Coupe
- 2014 328d Wagon, self-tuned, 270hp/430ft-lbs
- 2019 M2 Competition, self-tuned, 504whp
- 2016 Mini Cooper S
So the general rule of thumb with BMW is they don't turn rotors. That being said, the Minimum thickness is for turning and/or the thinnest they can be before you slap a last set of pads on them.
Even if you don't feel any shacking, if you want to ensure the new pads won't squeak, get the rotors turned. If there is a lip on the inside/outside of the braking surface, get them turned.
Darin
Current:
16 220i Active Tourer Platinsilver MET (C08)/Dakota Black (PDSW), P7ACA, P7LDA, P7LHA, P9BDA, 6sp Manual - Wife's new toy!
05 325it Electric Red(438)/Gray(N6TT) ZCW, ZSP 5sp Manual Back set cover, trunk mat, Euro Infra-Rot front windshield, and mud flaps! Mr. Wagon My new Winter car.
05 M3 Imolarot II(405)/Gray(N5TT) ZCW, ZPP 6sp Manual C.F. Lip, CSL diffuser, SSK, Euro Infra-Rot front windshield and a trunk liner! Mr. Go_Fast Stored for the Winter
Past:
95 318is Montreal Blue Met (297)/Beige(K1SN) RIP, killed by an Idiot.
84 M535i gray market Burgandy Rot Met/Black Leather Lowered by Intrax on bilies, poly everywhere, B&B cat back system, K&N, and a hitch! Da Beast - Still running w/400k+!
91 316i euro Tizianrot/Gray cloth - E-36 w/M-40 RIP, but great on gas! Best was 38 MPG
82 528i euro Saphire Blue Met/Blue Leather RIP
79 525 euro Green/Green RIP
79 318 Silver/Black - The first one that got it all started
M-Flight Member
Bookmarks