I'd like to install heavier sway bars in my 1999 (pre-facelift) Z3 2.8. I'm on a tight budget and I have heard that the "M" bars will fit. Can someone confirm?
The front Z3 bar is larger diameter than the M bar.
Oh, I heard that they were 28mm as opposed to mine which are 24mm
This gives Z3 sway bars sizes: http://bmwz3diys.weebly.com/sway-bars.html
H&R makes a set
http://www.hrsprings.com/products/detail/sway-bars
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good thinking. Have you tried https://www.allmagautoparts.com
Also you might find the h&r bars used here on the forum or eBay.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks for the link. They don't have anything in the size I want at the moment. (just one 15mm rear bar) I have looked at eBay. It's kind of tedious because many sellers do not list the diameters. I put in a request at a large local auto wreckers who belong to a network across North America. I'm hoping they turn up something.
If your front struts have the swaybar link mounts, just switch to M links. That will about double the bar's effective rate. Or is it four times? Need another cup of coffee and ponder that.
/.randy
No go on the rear. On the front, the M connects the swaybar to the strut housing for a near 1:1 motion ratio. The E36/Z3 connects in the middle of the control arm for about 2:1. This is why the M has a smaller bar than the other 6cyl. On the rear there is no easy place to gain leverage, so they brute-forced it with a bigger bar. Whic of course puts much more load into a part of the unibody that is already overstressed.
While looking at bars, some math. The stiffness of a bar goes up by the fourth power. Thus your 24mm bar is 20% stiffer than the 23mm bar on the M, not the 4% it would appear at first blush. On the motion ratio, I"m still having a Biden moment. is it the motion ratio, or motion ratio squared? Gawww I may have to drag out an old textbook.
/.randy
Thanks Randy. That is interesting about the 20% increase in stiffness from a 23mm to a 24mm. My rough math put it at the 4% that you mentioned but I guess I understand the physics just well enough to be dangerous. Since the M links would be my cheapest option, I think I'll pursue that for now and hopefully combine that with poly bushings throughout the rear end. (not diff mount)
Since installing the Lemforder M CABs, the car is so much more fun to drive! It just has a little more roll than I would like. I think the original shocks are functioning close to OEM spec. and the overall ride quality is fairly firm so I'm thinking sway bars are the way to go at this point. I say at this point because I like to do everything in a gradual step by step manner so that I can really get a sense of what each component does and therefore, be able to really dial the car in to my preferences.
Ah so youve started mixing and matching M with non-M suspension components...
Going into my TENTH YEAR of providing high quality reproduction BMW fabrics!
PRICE CUT on ALL FABRICS
Offering the best prices on the best quality reproduction fabrics!
Keep an eye on the FLCA outer ball joint, as it is a rubber isolated component. Now the you stiffened the FLCAB, the FLCA outer BJ is taking all the shock loads. You may have to upgrade to a FLCA that has solid outer BJ, such as a 1995M3, E30, or E30/E36 Meyle HD FLCA.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks