Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: 6 speed is useless

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Joppa, Md
    Posts
    2,554
    My Cars
    99 M Coupe,04 K1200rs

    6 speed is useless

    I thought my z3 with a zhp/6speed swap was great for a thousand miles or so, but now don't see why they went to the trouble, 5th and 6th are so close its ridiculous,a downshift has to be to 4th to even notice.

  2. #2
    MauiM3Mania's Avatar
    MauiM3Mania is offline Observer/Master Skeptic Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Central Pacific
    Posts
    10,826
    My Cars
    88M3 99M3 04M3 ITBx16
    What works for some, does not for others. I appreciate the overdrive provided by the sixth gear in both my E36 M3 and E46 M3.

    With a 3.91 in the E36, I need all the help I can get. Would I swap in a euro six speed and the 3.91 if I had to do it over, no. Consider where I live, there is no interstate. If I was on the mainland, yes I would have.

    The E46 isn't as drastic and that's how it was fitted from the factory. It surely helps with fuel mileage and general wear and tear.

    I wish my X5, with the 4.10, had a sixth gear/overdrive!
    04M3 TiAg 69k slick-top 3 pedal
    99M3 Cosmos 61k S50B32 euro 6Spd

    88M3 AW 43k miles Project FS


    WTB: 3.5" Eurosport/Conforti CAI

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Joppa, Md
    Posts
    2,554
    My Cars
    99 M Coupe,04 K1200rs
    Quote Originally Posted by MauiM3Mania View Post
    What works for some, does not for others. I appreciate the overdrive provided by the sixth gear in both my E36 M3 and E46 M3.

    With a 3.91 in the E36, I need all the help I can get. Would I swap in a euro six speed and the 3.91 if I had to do it over, no. Consider where I live, there is no interstate. If I was on the mainland, yes I would have.

    The E46 isn't as drastic and that's how it was fitted from the factory. It surely helps with fuel mileage and general wear and tear.

    I wish my X5, with the 4.10, had a sixth gear/overdrive!
    I had a 3.91 in my E36, actually put taller rear tires on it for a highway trip, O'fest in Carolina!, prolly gave me about what a 6 speed does, for cheap.

  4. #4
    MauiM3Mania's Avatar
    MauiM3Mania is offline Observer/Master Skeptic Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Central Pacific
    Posts
    10,826
    My Cars
    88M3 99M3 04M3 ITBx16
    I'm running the typical E36 M3 tire sizing of 245/40-17 (24.7" diameter) and the 3.91 final drive. Using an online gear ratio calculator, engine speeds at 60 mph are 2648 in 6th gear (.83OD), dropping down to 5th(1.00), engine speed rises to 3190 rpm. That seems significant.

    A tire that is approaching five inches greater in diameter would be needed to provide the same rpm drop which the six speed's overdrive offers.

    I'm not interested in running a 29.5" tall tire on my E36, if it were even possible.
    04M3 TiAg 69k slick-top 3 pedal
    99M3 Cosmos 61k S50B32 euro 6Spd

    88M3 AW 43k miles Project FS


    WTB: 3.5" Eurosport/Conforti CAI

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,414
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    I am running a GS6-53, which has a 0.87 6th gear. The 420G has a 0.82.

  6. #6
    MauiM3Mania's Avatar
    MauiM3Mania is offline Observer/Master Skeptic Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Central Pacific
    Posts
    10,826
    My Cars
    88M3 99M3 04M3 ITBx16
    Quote Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
    I am running a GS6-53, which has a 0.87 6th gear. The 420G has a 0.82.
    Whats you take on the overdrive, worthwhile? I've read the ratio of sixth gear in the 420G is actually .828.
    04M3 TiAg 69k slick-top 3 pedal
    99M3 Cosmos 61k S50B32 euro 6Spd

    88M3 AW 43k miles Project FS


    WTB: 3.5" Eurosport/Conforti CAI

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,414
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    To me it is a noticeable difference that I appreciate even with the 3.15 in my E36. I appreciate it even more with a short diff like the factory one in my E90.

    I changed trans for strength since I had broken 2 ZF320. The 6th was a bonus. With the 3.15, I have no complaints about the 1:1 5th in the ZF320. I have run 3.23, 3.38 and 3.64 as well with the ZF320 and wanted a 6 speed for the overdrive. Some overdrive is better than none.

    But honestly, since 6 to me is strictly for highway cruising, it is purely an overdrive and I would be happy if it was 0.75. A modified engine could still handle that. Top speed on a stock car might go down because of the reduced power that comes with the reduced rpm. If you underdrive enough, top speed could actually end up being in 5th gear. I like acceleration. I don’t really care about how far past 150 the car will go.

    Anyway, I like the OD but if you are using a 3.15 or 3.23 you don’t really need it. It is an expensive conversion and might add 50 lbs.

    The OP does not find the conversion to be worthwhile. I would guess he does not spend much time on the highway or he he does, he cruises at around 65-70. The rpm are not objectionable with a 5 speed and 3.23 at that rpm. But if you cruise at 80-85, they might be. Your exhaust could also be a factor since different rpm can bring different noises or vibrations.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Joppa, Md
    Posts
    2,554
    My Cars
    99 M Coupe,04 K1200rs
    Quote Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
    To me it is a noticeable difference that I appreciate even with the 3.15 in my E36. I appreciate it even more with a short diff like the factory one in my E90.

    I changed trans for strength since I had broken 2 ZF320. The 6th was a bonus. With the 3.15, I have no complaints about the 1:1 5th in the ZF320. I have run 3.23, 3.38 and 3.64 as well with the ZF320 and wanted a 6 speed for the overdrive. Some overdrive is better than none.

    But honestly, since 6 to me is strictly for highway cruising, it is purely an overdrive and I would be happy if it was 0.75. A modified engine could still handle that. Top speed on a stock car might go down because of the reduced power that comes with the reduced rpm. If you underdrive enough, top speed could actually end up being in 5th gear. I like acceleration. I don’t really care about how far past 150 the car will go.

    Anyway, I like the OD but if you are using a 3.15 or 3.23 you don’t really need it. It is an expensive conversion and might add 50 lbs.

    The OP does not find the conversion to be worthwhile. I would guess he does not spend much time on the highway or he he does, he cruises at around 65-70. The rpm are not objectionable with a 5 speed and 3.23 at that rpm. But if you cruise at 80-85, they might be. Your exhaust could also be a factor since different rpm can bring different noises or vibrations.
    You've gotten my point, the OD ratio is so close to 5th,its a joke, I'd love a .75 for the interstate trips, which are now usually averaging 75/80 mph., I do have a stainless header and big exhaust system, but drone isn't objectionable, I'm thinking of going back to my 3.46, for autocross acceleration..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,414
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    When I had the 3.23 then 3.38 then 3.64 with 5 speed, I found the highway rpm to be more and more objectionable. At the end with the 3.64, which I loved, I was unhappy enough with highway driving that I was shopping for a 6 speed conversion. Just about any rpm reduction would be welcome.

    Download the rpm calculator from the technical tab at the diffs online website. Plug in tires and diff ratio and 6th gear and have fun.

    I use to run 255/40/17, which made my 3.64 into maybe a 3.58. Still, it was more than I wanted on the highway. Ultimately instead of the 6 speed conversion back then, I removed the supercharger and 3.64 and installed a turbo and a 3.15. Bliss. Massive turbo torque made the car way faster with the 3.15 than with the 3.64 and supercharger. The $2k in 6 speed conversion costs covered much of the difference between the supercharger proceeds and the turbo system costs. Honestly, I’d be happy with a 2.93 now, but it’s not a priority.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Joppa, Md
    Posts
    2,554
    My Cars
    99 M Coupe,04 K1200rs
    Quote Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
    When I had the 3.23 then 3.38 then 3.64 with 5 speed, I found the highway rpm to be more and more objectionable. At the end with the 3.64, which I loved, I was unhappy enough with highway driving that I was shopping for a 6 speed conversion. Just about any rpm reduction would be welcome.

    Download the rpm calculator from the technical tab at the diffs online website. Plug in tires and diff ratio and 6th gear and have fun.

    I use to run 255/40/17, which made my 3.64 into maybe a 3.58. Still, it was more than I wanted on the highway. Ultimately instead of the 6 speed conversion back then, I removed the supercharger and 3.64 and installed a turbo and a 3.15. Bliss. Massive turbo torque made the car way faster with the 3.15 than with the 3.64 and supercharger. The $2k in 6 speed conversion costs covered much of the difference between the supercharger proceeds and the turbo system costs. Honestly, I’d be happy with a 2.93 now, but it’s not a priority.
    My 3.91 was like a cheap supercharger, 1st was useless, and interstate travel was at 4k, I've always thought turbo was the answer, with that 2.93, lol, newer vettes get better MPG than I did.they are running 65 mph at just above idle speed.

  11. #11
    MauiM3Mania's Avatar
    MauiM3Mania is offline Observer/Master Skeptic Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Central Pacific
    Posts
    10,826
    My Cars
    88M3 99M3 04M3 ITBx16
    Quote Originally Posted by 325bob View Post
    My 3.91 was like a cheap supercharger, 1st was useless, and interstate travel was at 4k, I've always thought turbo was the answer, with that 2.93, lol, newer vettes get better MPG than I did.they are running 65 mph at just above idle speed.
    I believe the C6 Corvette had a 0.50 overdrive. My brother had a C6 and it cruised the interstate with amazing fuel mileage. Those cars also had the torque to pull it off with the gearing.
    04M3 TiAg 69k slick-top 3 pedal
    99M3 Cosmos 61k S50B32 euro 6Spd

    88M3 AW 43k miles Project FS


    WTB: 3.5" Eurosport/Conforti CAI

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    9,943
    My Cars
    2018 BMW M240i
    Hey, swap in a 2 speed GM powerglide transmission!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Joppa, Md
    Posts
    2,554
    My Cars
    99 M Coupe,04 K1200rs
    Quote Originally Posted by MarcoZandrini View Post
    Hey, swap in a 2 speed GM powerglide transmission!
    or the 1 speed "Turboglide", still not sure what that was.

Similar Threads

  1. Useless post: some numbers and speeds for you 1/4mile freaks...
    By Vader M3 in forum Track, Auto-X & Drag Racing sponsored by Bimmerparts.com
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-28-2002, 12:30 PM
  2. Is there a way to buy a six speed through BMW?
    By Josh///M3 in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-29-2001, 01:16 PM
  3. Top speed poll
    By gerry_miranda in forum General BMW and Automotive Discussion sponsored by Intercity Lines
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 03-24-2001, 10:57 PM
  4. How is the speed?
    By ray in forum General BMW and Automotive Discussion sponsored by Intercity Lines
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-28-2001, 02:03 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •