Originally Posted by
AmbOfGlory
Hey guys, probably stupid question, but I haven’t found much on this one.
I’ve really only had one issue with my ‘97 M3 when I brought it home last Memorial Day, and that was a terribly low clutch engagement. Even with the clutch pedal stop removed, the clutch was not fully disengaged, and getting it into gear once the transmission was warm was a real problem. Well, I tackled this one before I’d really plunged into the vast knowledge available, and replaced the clutch master and slave cylinders, deleting the stupid clutch return spring system while I was at it (DO this, I love it!). The master was definitely bad. The slave seemed good, but was definitely original, and I had thought (imagined?) my new slave made a marginal improvement before I bit the bullet and replaced the master.
With both replaced, the car is worlds better, but still not perfect. Engagement is still at the floor. Shift effort is greater with the engine running than off, so I have yet to replace the clutch pedal stop. After a lot of research, and considering the car’s age, my money is now in the transmission, probably on worn clutch fingers. But, I still suspect the new slave cylinder I installed. It’s a Febi, and from what I’ve read, their hydraulic parts are hit-and-miss.
Now I will be replacing the clutch eventually, but in the meantime, I found a company called Rogue Engineering that makes a variable length slave pin. It’s got a threaded rod with a locking nut to adjust the pin’s length a small amount. The alternative is replacing the Febi slave with an FTE one, which may or may not work if the real problem is clutch fingers. I would think the RE slave pin WOULD solve the issue, at least temporarily, plus it wouldn’t require any bleeding. In theory you could have full control of where the engagement point is.
Does anyone have any experience with one of these? Is it a solid option or am I going to hyperextend something in the clutch system?
Bookmarks