Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 32 of 32

Thread: Tooth count on the S54 and S52 crank shaft sprocket that drives the oil pump

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,855
    My Cars
    1995 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky goes View Post
    aeronaut,
    you may be right about the hydraulic lifters not needing more oil than solid lifters. I don't know that they do.

    My whole premise was to increase pressure/flow to the S52 head on the basis that lifter tick is a symptom of a lack of oil in the head when puling lateral Gs on track. That would explain the scoring on the camshaft journals. Scoring that is pretty common when I looked at used S52 cams. I'm looking for increased flow regardless of the way to achieve it, based on my assumption that the head is starved. I could be wrong.

    I will update at the end of next racing season. Hopefully with good news.
    I think you're absolutely right.

    FYI, I also think scoring on the cam journals is caused by something chunky and hard in the oil. If you look, I think you'll find a lot of the time the score is located in line with the oil feed hole in the journal. So some particulate gets pushed into the journal through the oil feed, and embeds itself. That's a theory anyway.
    Last edited by aeronaut; 02-10-2020 at 09:46 PM.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,413
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    Most S52 cams are scored. Even with less than 200k miles and no racing.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    670
    My Cars
    E46 330 ZHP, E36 328i
    pbonslab
    If that is so, my objective has now be downgraded to reduce (Instead of eliminate) scoring of the camshaft...
    ...You don't always get what you want...

  4. #29
    NeilM is offline Member BMW E36 M3 Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    5,016
    My Cars
    96 M3, 15 Golf R, 18 Q5
    Quote Originally Posted by aeronaut View Post
    On this topic of buying used, is the Euro S50 oil pan essentially the same in this application?
    Yes, as long as it's from the S50B32; this is the pan I have. The S50B30 didn't have the dual pickup oil pump.

    Both the Euro dual pickup pump and pan have detail differences compared to the S54 parts, but are physically interchangeable. Here's what mine looked like after bead-blasting:

    DSC00848-sm2.jpg

    DSC00850-Sm.jpg

    Quote Originally Posted by aeronaut View Post
    Neil,

    Prior to the VAC modified pump, and with the S50 Euro pump/pickup setup, you say you were seeing 40 psi oil pressure at around 3,500 rpm. What were you seeing at idle?
    Not sure I remember accurately, but with cold oil over 10 psi, and with hot oil the oil pressure light was flickering (not uncommon). I don't worry much about idle pressure, since the engine is under no load. But it was irritating. Bumping the idle speed by 100 rpm would certainly take care of it.

    FYI, I have read that both the S52 and S54 oil pressures are limited to 58psi. Wondering if anyone can confirm?
    I believe it's 4 bar nominal max for both, so 59 psi.

    Neil

  5. #30
    NeilM is offline Member BMW E36 M3 Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    5,016
    My Cars
    96 M3, 15 Golf R, 18 Q5
    Quote Originally Posted by aeronaut View Post
    I'm not sure I buy into the belief that the hydraulic lifters on the S50/52 require higher oil volume (or pressure) under normal conditions. The way I understand how they work, there's very very little flow into/out of those lifters once they are pumped up. And even if they are 'empty', they pump up very slowly.
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky goes View Post
    aeronaut,
    you may be right about the hydraulic lifters not needing more oil than solid lifters. I don't know that they do.

    My whole premise was to increase pressure/flow to the S52 head on the basis that lifter tick is a symptom of a lack of oil in the head when puling lateral Gs on track. That would explain the scoring on the camshaft journals. Scoring that is pretty common when I looked at used S52 cams. I'm looking for increased flow regardless of the way to achieve it, based on my assumption that the head is starved. I could be wrong.
    The hydraulic lifters definitely do require more oil than solid lifters. This is born out both by theory and practice.

    Here is a very interesting page about BMW hydraulic lifters:
    https://www.enginebuildermag.com/200...ppet-problems/

    First, when the lifters pump up, they do not retain their internal oil pressure forever. Their ball check valves are not perfectly effective, particularly when they're old. (There are You-Tube videos on how to clean and recondition them.) Second, if the oil pump pickup gets exposed during cornering it'll inhale air, and eventually some of that air will quickly make its way into the lifters, causing the well known lifter clatter we'd all like to get rid of. I've personally seen oil pressure drop well into the teens in a particular corner (T8 at Putnam) with the stock S50/52 pump.

    Not only do the lifters require oil flow to keep them pumped up, even once that happens, their pressurized oil feed via the lifter tray oil galleries will still constantly flow out around the lifters and into the tray bores in which the lifters move. There are no oil seals there, just the lifter OD to bore ID clearance, and there are 24 of those bores to drain away oil pressure.

    Then, after using the same oil pump guts for years in various different engines, BMW downsized the pump, starting with the S50B32 engine that uses solid, non-hydraulic lifters that otherwise resemble hydraulic lifters, but which function as passive spacers. The lower capacity pump was then carried over to the S54, which has no lifters at all, instead using finger cam followers.

    We can only guess, but a reasonable supposition is that the downsized oil pump was intended to reduce parasitic loads on the engine, increasing net power output and decreasing fuel consumption. All manufacturers have been doing that with driven accessories, which is why we now have electric power steering, variable displacement A/C compressors, and so on. My Golf R daily even has a dual displacement engine oil pump that's electronically switched between high and low outputs, depending on demand.

    But when you take the lower output pump and install it on an engine with higher oil demand, the result is reduced pressure, since the pump is now being asked to supply a whole new mechanical sub-system. Oil pressure and flow are inversely related:



    When you add another branch to the oil distribution tree, thus increasing oil flow demand, oil pressure drops unless the pump has surplus capacity. That's exactly what we see when a stock S54 pump is dropped into an S50/52 engine. And when the higher capacity modded S54 pump is substituted, the pressure drop goes away.

    I don't claim any particular virtue — much less good financial sense! — for having done this, but I'm likely one of a pretty small group of people who've tried stock S52, stock S54 and modified S54 pumps on the same car with no other changes. (And yeah, I've become bizarrely proficient at changing out oil pumps.)

    The results, positive and otherwise, speak for themselves.

    Neil

    PS: Which is not to say that the dual pickup pan/pump is the only way to go. It's an elegant solution, and has the considerable virtue of using stock, albeit tweaked, parts. It's also entirely internal to the engine, which is where I like my oil to be. But it's not cheap, although careful shopping can make it much more affordable than using all new parts.

    But people like the Accusump, which seemingly does its job and is relatively economical. You do have to mount it somewhere, and run oil lines, install control valves, wiring, etc. For similar cost you'd be a chump not to address the root cause rather than applying a bandaid — but the cost isn't similar.
    Last edited by NeilM; 02-12-2020 at 04:07 PM.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,855
    My Cars
    1995 M3
    Good stuff! I like learning how all this works (or doesn't).
    I had settled on the accusump, but was concerned about where I'd mount, and I really didn't want to run oil lines into the cabin. That, with the fact accusump makes a big deal about mounting the accusump solidly, had me wondering.

    Then, another member offered a used S54 setup for a reasonable price. And yea, now everything will be managed in the oil pan. I was on the fence with the VAC oil pump mod. The FI guys seem to have some alternative fixes for this, but requires detailed knowledge and machining. If it were Dec and not Feb, I'd probably investigate and save a few hundred dollars. So I'll likely be sending VAC my pump and a chunk of cash, all to buy "I'll never worry about this again".

    The only question is which will take longer; me making a decision on springs and getting the head back from the machine shop, or FEDEX and VAC. I've got 3.5 weeks to the first event. Gonna be tight.

  7. #32
    NeilM is offline Member BMW E36 M3 Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    5,016
    My Cars
    96 M3, 15 Golf R, 18 Q5
    Quote Originally Posted by aeronaut View Post
    Then, another member offered a used S54 setup for a reasonable price.
    The magic words! ;-)

    VAC turned my pump around in a week or less. YMMV.

    Neil

    PS: Make sure they know it's for an S50 application, otherwise you'll get an S54 sprocket.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. E36 S54 Oil Pan for e36 conversion, s52 Crank, s54 oil filter housing+euro e36 oil cooler
    By e30kid89 in forum Engines, Performance Parts & Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-08-2018, 11:17 AM
  2. Brand NEW -- S52 crank shaft - Lightened, Balanced, the works!
    By M3Rob95 in forum Engines, Performance Parts & Software
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-28-2013, 09:13 AM
  3. S54 and S52 crank interchange question
    By futureroadracer in forum Forced Induction
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-14-2012, 12:42 PM
  4. CA: WTB s52 crank shaft
    By sscorpsman in forum Engines, Performance Parts & Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-21-2009, 10:44 PM
  5. s52 crank shaft
    By The Badass Gold in forum BMW Parts Wanted
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-21-2007, 12:13 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •