Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: kingpin differences

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,852
    My Cars
    1995 M3

    kingpin differences

    I know I've seen this described somewhere, but couldn't find...

    (At least) 3 kingpin types for E36's, 2 for M3 and 1 (maybe more?) for all other E36's.
    Using part #'s for right kingpins as an example below, anyone have the differences?

    M3
    95 S50 M3: 31212227358
    96-99 S52 M3: 31212227908

    Non M
    All: 31211092080




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,852
    My Cars
    1995 M3
    Ok, found a fairly informative thread here:
    https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...E36-M3-spindle

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,810
    My Cars
    99 M3

    kingpin differences

    Ya, three King Pins different Part Numbers L/R.
    The change in geometry in the 1996+M3 causes a reduction in the top-of-tire gap to strut. This axle angle change drove a strut positional change in the Guide Support, as result the top-of-strut moved outboard.
    It is likely standard E36 and 1995M3 share the same King Pin/spindle geometry, though 1995M3 (and 1996+M3) has a different interface for the E34M5 brake caliper carrier bracket. These and other parts are shared with the Z3 range, though the Z3“M” models use the 1996+M3 components - spindle, FLCA, FLCAB, and Guide Support.

    Additionally, three FLCAs, three FLCABushings, and three different Guide Supports/bearing plates. None should be mixed and matched. Though many claim that Meyle E36 HD FLCAs + the 1995M3 offset FLCABs is an acceptable substitute for the unique 1996+M3 components. These with the 1996+M3 King Pins on a 1995M3 can yield more static negative camber, using the 1996+M3 Guide Supports swapped LR/RL or camber plates.

    1995M3 and 1996+M3 FLCAs both feature solid ball joints, though different geometry. 1996+M3 got new King Pins, FLCAs, a nearly solid but centered FLCAB and revised Guide Support geometry. These changes all yield more King Pin inclination at steering full lock.
    All other E36 FLCAs have a rubber Isolated outer ball joint. Standard E36 FLCAs and the 1995M3 FLCAs share the same geometry with E30 FLCA. 1995M3 uses a nearly solid FLCAB though offset to add needed caster. Internet lores says E36 FLCAs have larger BJs than the E30 to handle the added weight of the E36.

    E36 up to 6/92
    King Pin 31211092079 / 31211092080
    FLCA 31126758513 / 31126758514
    FLCAB 31129059288
    Guide Support 31331139436

    E36 6/92 and-on
    King Pin 31211092079 / 31211092080
    FLCA 31126758513 / 31126758514
    FLCAB 31129059288
    FLCAB M-Technic 31129064875
    Guide Support 31336779613

    1995M3
    King Pin 31212227357 / 31212227358
    FLCA 31121139789 / 31121139790
    FLCAB 31129064875
    Guide Support 31332228345

    1996+M3
    King Pin 31212227907 / 31212227908
    FLCA. 31122228461 / 31122228462
    FLCAB 31129069035
    Guide Support 31332227897 / 31332227898
    Last edited by bluptgm3; 06-29-2020 at 11:47 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,852
    My Cars
    1995 M3
    Thanks, great info!

    I guess the bottom line to remember for a track only car, is the chassis's for these cars are all the same. The geometry of the front is defined by the top strut mount, the kingpin, and the LCA (including its bushing). That's really it between all the E36 models. So for a track car that has camber/caster plates, it's then the kingpin and LCA. On my 95, I use camber plates AND shims to get the camber I want, and the shims move the strut closer to the tire, just like the 96+ kingpins do.

    Why am I asking all this?
    I'd like to find a spare pair of kingpins to modify. 95 M's are pretty rare. 96+ M's are pretty expensive. lol

  5. #5
    mslevin's Avatar
    mslevin is offline Have you checked RealOEM? BMW CCA Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Posts
    915
    My Cars
    E36, E38, E46
    I feel like we're working on really similar projects right now aeronaut, you keep posting threads that answer the questions I have!

    I have a 95 M3 I'm building and am going to source 96+ kingpins for the car.

    Quote Originally Posted by bluptgm3 View Post
    Additionally, three FLCAs, three FLCABushings, and three different Guide Supports/bearing plates. None should be mixed and matched. Though many claim that Meyle E36 HD FLCAs + the 1995M3 offset FLCABs is an acceptable substitute for the unique 1996+M3 components. These with the 1996+M3 King Pins on a 1995M3 can yield more static negative camber, using the 1996+M3 Guide Supports swapped LR/RL or camber plates.
    Why shouldn't they be mixed? My plan was to do exactly that: HD FLCAs and '95 offset FLCABs. My research and discussions with FCP Euro + Bimmerworld have lead me to believe its a very valid substitute for 96+ components (and at 1/3 of the price).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,852
    My Cars
    1995 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by mslevin View Post
    I feel like we're working on really similar projects right now aeronaut, you keep posting threads that answer the questions I have!

    I have a 95 M3 I'm building and am going to source 96+ kingpins for the car.



    Why shouldn't they be mixed? My plan was to do exactly that: HD FLCAs and '95 offset FLCABs. My research and discussions with FCP Euro + Bimmerworld have lead me to believe its a very valid substitute for 96+ components (and at 1/3 of the price).
    Glad I can help, by not knowing what to do before you. lol.

    My understanding was also that 96 kingpins, E36 (non M) HD LCAs, and offset LCA bushings would get you very close to 96 geometry. The main thing I want is:
    - Lower kingpin replacement cost
    - Increased maximum camber (without the use of shims)

    I'd think with all the things we do to these cars for the track (camber/castor plates, wheel spacers coilovers), one could get a good setup mixing and matching kingpings and LCAs (among M3 parts).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,810
    My Cars
    99 M3

    kingpin differences

    Quote Originally Posted by mslevin View Post
    I feel like we're working on really similar projects right now aeronaut, you keep posting threads that answer the questions I have!
    I have a 95 M3 I'm building and am going to source 96+ kingpins for the car.
    Why shouldn't they be mixed? My plan was to do exactly that: HD FLCAs and '95 offset FLCABs. My research and discussions with FCP Euro + Bimmerworld have lead me to believe its a very valid substitute for 96+ components (and at 1/3 of the price).
    Quote Originally Posted by bluptgm3 View Post
    Additionally, three FLCAs, three FLCABushings, and three different Guide Supports/bearing plates. None should be mixed and matched. Though many claim that Meyle E36 HD FLCAs + the 1995M3 offset FLCABs is an acceptable substitute for the unique 1996+M3 components.
    I do not know the exact geometric differences, however with camber plates any minor issues (if they exist) can probably be masked/corrected.
    BimmerWorld used to have a pallet full of (L & R) 1996+M3 King Pins and sell these as a ‘kit’ w/Meyle HD E36 FLCAs + 1995M3 offset FLCABs.

    LOL!! IF BMW created the the same geometry with the ‘new’ King Pin, FLCA and FLCAB that replicates the E36/‘95 E36M3 FLCA geometry plus an offset FLCAB, why design a ‘new’ FLCA for the 1996+M3? Got to be more going on....

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by bluptgm3; 06-25-2020 at 05:50 PM.

  8. #8
    mslevin's Avatar
    mslevin is offline Have you checked RealOEM? BMW CCA Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Posts
    915
    My Cars
    E36, E38, E46
    Quote Originally Posted by bluptgm3 View Post
    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Ahh sorry I misread that. I thought you meant "none should be matched, even though some claim..." implying they were wrong. Thanks!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Oneida, NY
    Posts
    6,370
    My Cars
    1993 318is/who to knows
    So... The strut mounts on the chassis are different from 96 on. Theres "M" parts of each. And non m parts of each. So theres 4 seperate full suspensions.. Some use same individual parts..

    So the point is to make early chassis as close to late chassis systems as possible... To make late chassis as "M" as possible. What do you do when you already have "M" suspension? (With the usual mods like plates).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,852
    My Cars
    1995 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by spyderg0d View Post
    So... The strut mounts on the chassis are different from 96 on. Theres "M" parts of each. And non m parts of each. So theres 4 seperate full suspensions.. Some use same individual parts..

    So the point is to make early chassis as close to late chassis systems as possible... To make late chassis as "M" as possible. What do you do when you already have "M" suspension? (With the usual mods like plates).
    I'm not convinced 96M vs 95M is "better", but there are minor differences. Depends on what your end-state is. But past that;
    Roll center correction, bump steer correction, steering quickness.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central, MD
    Posts
    3,852
    My Cars
    1995 M3
    Just FYI, the whole reason I asked the original question, is that I have an MRT roll center (RC) correction kit on my 95.
    But, I haven't lowered my car enough to "need" it. I expect that's a bad thing (lowering RC 30mm but not lowering CG at least as much).
    There are other down sides to the MRT, or any other of these kits. There's 2mm or so clearance between the LCA and rotor, and I'd like to consider upgrading to wilwood calipers and a slightly thicker rotor. The MRT kit prevents that. (Other RC kits may, or may not, work.) There are other fixes for a brake upgrade, but all this has to work together.

    But I absolutely LOVE the steering ratio improvement provided by the MRT kit. Catching quick oversteer glitches is no longer a hand over hand pray to be fast enough event. I just, correct, and keep driving. The car is so much more drivable with the quicker steering. I'm surprised by how much more fun it is, for me.
    So what I really want, is the tie-rod end moved closer to the steering axis. Looking into re-welding a stock kingpin.
    Hence, buying a spare set of kingpins.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,810
    My Cars
    99 M3

    kingpin differences

    LOL!! Ya, I would like to see comparative numbers also....as the KP-to-FLCA lug got relocated in the 1996+M3 King Pin(spindle) along with revisions to FLCA/FLCAB/Guide Support redesign. Did the hole center for the Tie Rod interface move also, relative to the Tie Rod interface? Potentially that redesign closed the distance of the two center lines.
    What influence does the 1996+M3 centered FLCAB have on rotation axis of the FLCA and the front roll center focal point?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Last edited by bluptgm3; 06-26-2020 at 01:37 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    341
    My Cars
    93' Turbo 325i Coupe
    Potentially unrelated but you apparently can only buy 96+ kingpins second hand now as BMW don't make them brand new. I just bought a set of `95 kingpins (which BMW still produce) from BW and shipped to Aus (set me back a small fortune) to run a BB Kit designed for an M3 on my 325i. But good timing on the conversation, I could've used this information a few months ago haha.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,810
    My Cars
    99 M3

    kingpin differences

    Quote Originally Posted by dominator293 View Post
    Potentially unrelated but you apparently can only buy 96+ kingpins second hand now as BMW don't make them brand new. I just bought a set of `95 kingpins (which BMW still produce) from BW and shipped to Aus (set me back a small fortune) to run a BB Kit designed for an M3 on my 325i. But good timing on the conversation, I could've used this information a few months ago haha.
    The 1995 M3 Spindle/King Pin has the same geometry as non-“M” or 325 Spindle/King Pin, but base E36 spindle does not accept M3 Calipers/Brackets.
    Run the 1995M3 FLCAs (or Meyle HDs) and the 1995M3 Offset FLCABs.

    I assume you are running camber plates?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by bluptgm3; 07-11-2020 at 08:21 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. What's the difference?
    By Disturbed Kat in forum General BMW and Automotive Discussion sponsored by Intercity Lines
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-06-2001, 12:35 AM
  2. No difference in 9005 & 9006 HL bulbs
    By Sean~328i//EastBay in forum 1991 - 1999 (E36)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-12-2001, 07:22 PM
  3. What's the difference?
    By Bob ///M3 in forum General BMW and Automotive Discussion sponsored by Intercity Lines
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-10-2001, 04:25 PM
  4. what kind of difference will a new....
    By joeyc in forum Car Audio & Electronics sponsored by Bavsound
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-07-2001, 11:09 PM
  5. Short Shifter: A Different Perspective
    By SlickM3 in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-28-2001, 07:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •