Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Half The Cylinders, Twice The Fun: The M5-Powered 836CSL

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    2
    My Cars
    1995 BMW 840Ci

    Half The Cylinders, Twice The Fun: The M5-Powered 836CSL


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Ca
    Posts
    6,981
    My Cars
    2001 525it
    Interesting

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    307
    My Cars
    1990 850i and 1970 2800C
    it stays a "heavy" car…. and will miss torque out of that 6 cilinder S38..... i had a M5 like that , only comes alive above 4000 rpm… better for track , not road.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Upstate, SC
    Posts
    96
    My Cars
    93_850Ci 90_735 89_325iX
    Quote Originally Posted by Belgiumbarry View Post
    it stays a "heavy" car…. and will miss torque out of that 6 cilinder S38..... i had a M5 like that , only comes alive above 4000 rpm… better for track , not road.
    He actually got the weight down to 3500lb, which is a pretty respectable achievement! I'm sure that engine absolutely sings in that car.

    I've always wondered if anybody had ever tried to put an M30 in the E31, looks like this guy took it up one notch! I'm sure from a performance perspective it wasn't worth what it cost him to build this car, but it is a truly gorgeous specimen.
    (OO==[][]==OO)
    1993 BMW 850Ci
    1990 BMW 735i
    1989 BMW 325iX
    1988 BMW 325iC Convertible

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    54,749
    My Cars
    11/88 E32 750iL+98 E36M3
    Have seen that car on some meetings here in Japan and also on a drift course, he likes drifting
    My wrenching buddy made some videos years ago when he drove with him on a drift course and 2 videos also show the engine running with hood open
    drift course https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...R51wTjGErD4c5P
    engine running
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bNb6oHg1_w
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB21e41SweY

    Ebisu Circuit – The Home Of Drifting https://driftinjapan.com/ebisu-circu...e-of-drifting/
    Shogun tricks and tips for the E32 series are HERE!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Ramon, CA
    Posts
    1,433
    My Cars
    850Ci, M5, Model-S P85D
    I'd stay away from the S38 motor.
    I have a 1991 M5 with S38B36 (owned since new) sitting along side my 1997 850 M73B54 (owned since 2004) in the garage.
    The S38B36 (high RPM HP motor) has the engine sounds to die for, however the M73B54 (torque monster) is King for cruising.
    With that, more V12 have been put into E34 chassis than L6's have been put into the E31 and for good reasons!!
    The S38, L6 engine (extremely limited production 12,200 cars 1998-1996) will cost you more than any other motor you could put into an E31 and it only has 315 Hp and 265 lb-ft of torque.
    The S62B50 V8 from the E39, M5 with 394 HP & 369 lb-ft of torque would show much more power and be a less expensive motor swap.
    Personal experience: I have chased all kinds of cars on the mountain roads of California and while the M5 may scream like a banshee at 7k RPMs as you row through the gears the 850 with the 5.4L V12 and 5-speed auto is faster despite the extra weight.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    2,365
    My Cars
    93 850Ci, 09 Caddy SRX
    Interesting....
    1993 850Ci.....18 years & 165,000 miles and counting!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Hyperworld
    Posts
    888
    My Cars
    '97 840CI
    Quote Originally Posted by m6bigdog View Post
    ... the M73B54 (torque monster) is King...
    This is completely supported by the math.
    The B36's 266 ft-lbs vs 3500 is equivalent to the 4.4 V8 vs 4100 lbs, which is to say not very impressive.
    On the other hand, which would you rather toss into a corner, 4100 or 3500 lbs.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Ramon, CA
    Posts
    1,433
    My Cars
    850Ci, M5, Model-S P85D
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyper View Post
    This is completely supported by the math.
    The B36's 266 ft-lbs vs 3500 is equivalent to the 4.4 V8 vs 4100 lbs, which is to say not very impressive.
    On the other hand, which would you rather toss into a corner, 4100 or 3500 lbs.
    Hyper, vehicle weight is a single component if road performance; not the end-all-be-all.
    Suspension geometry, roll stiffness and tire patch/compound can be a more significant contribution.
    If chassis weight was the determining factor then the lightest vehicle would always be faster and more agile.
    I also love chasing down the assumed performance cars on mountain roads with my Tesla P85D which weighs 4900 lbs.
    Oh, the Tesla's advantage is all wheel drive and 690 lb-ft of torque.
    So the Tesla may not be the fasted going through the turn but exiting, you better be prepared for a whole new experience.
    That is, if you can get the passenger to let go of your neck and stop screaming.
    The Tesla is first car I have owned that REQUIRES that you change lanes before you hit the throttle when passing. Yep, several close calls with the instant acceleration!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    611
    My Cars
    840ci
    Quote Originally Posted by m6bigdog View Post
    I'd stay away from the S38 motor.
    I have a 1991 M5 with S38B36 (owned since new) sitting along side my 1997 850 M73B54 (owned since 2004) in the garage.
    The S38B36 (high RPM HP motor) has the engine sounds to die for, however the M73B54 (torque monster) is King for cruising.
    With that, more V12 have been put into E34 chassis than L6's have been put into the E31 and for good reasons!!
    The S38, L6 engine (extremely limited production 12,200 cars 1998-1996) will cost you more than any other motor you could put into an E31 and it only has 315 Hp and 265 lb-ft of torque.
    The S62B50 V8 from the E39, M5 with 394 HP & 369 lb-ft of torque would show much more power and be a less expensive motor swap.
    Personal experience: I have chased all kinds of cars on the mountain roads of California and while the M5 may scream like a banshee at 7k RPMs as you row through the gears the 850 with the 5.4L V12 and 5-speed auto is faster despite the extra weight.
    I would love to put in the s62 on my 840 but too bad I live in California
    Do you know how difficult is the swap and perhaps the potential to get it bar'd in cali?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    4,682
    My Cars
    BMW 850
    I have been considering a s85 swap

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sunny Cali,
    Posts
    8,730
    My Cars
    6.5 second 69 Camaro
    Thought you already have a S/70

    Force induct it.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    DC / Maryland
    Posts
    196
    My Cars
    '11 535xi, '92 850i
    Had the S38 3.6 and with the right modifications, it screams. The mid to upper end torque issue are mainly solved by using 3.8 cam gears which move the torque band lower, a good performance chip (since gas has improved), and the right gearing to a 3.91. An M5 wagon is not far off the weight of an e31 M70 and if this person reduced weight lower than a stock e34 M5, then I am sure it screams. Plus, the S38 is really a race->street engine that has solid lifters, sodium-filled valves, beautiful stainless steel headers from factory, and can take the beating. Mine dyno'd at around 272 wheel HP on a Mustang dyno (those typically measure lower), which equates to ~330hp at the engine. I had a 4.5k rpm operating range between 3000-7500, so most of the time I never changed past 3rd gear during spirited driving.

    Performance chips are where a lot of the power comes with this old engine and Dinan, which only tunes above 4k rpm, is one of the worst tunes for the S38. Powerchip and Landzer are really good since they log real-world time/data. I confirmed with safe A/F in my dyno runs with both chips. Not only looking at peak numbers, the area under the curve (AUC) for torque/HP filled out real nice in every rpm giving very usable power even in part-throttle. Heck, still I daily drove my e34 S38 during winters and city traffic.

    Even with 2 passengers in the e34, I would beat the e31 M70 (brother drove the 850i with the Comforti chips, S3 mode) at the stoplight and highway. M70 is well maintained. As a head to head difference, I think while torque is force, the horsepower here is how the torque is being realized in speed. Perhaps also less rotating mass contributes to the engine spinning up faster too. No doubt, the S38 with mild mods is faster than an M60 in an e31 (my e34 S38 was faster than several e34 M60s). I sold the 3.6, but wonder if the e31 M70 would have done better with an EML chip.

    The e34 S38 was for fun and a good sleeper, but the e31 is still the long-term keeper. I had to "explain" the e34 for people to get it, not so with the e31.
    Brandon J
    '11 535xi MSport, Dynamic Handling, Active Roll, "Flappy Paddles," HUD, Lane(s), Premium, Cold, Comfort Seats, 5 Cameras, 4-zones, Auto Highs, Hex trim, Powerflex thrust bushings, ceramic coated, Bootmod3, charge pipe, larger intercooler, etc.
    '92 850i, Wokke chips, T-stars, e34 M5 thrust bushings, refreshed top end, NGK BKR6EK, ceramic coated, K-bars GenII
    '08 XC90 3.2, 7 Seats, Retrofit Morimoto HID Projectors, iPd sways, Powerflex LCA bushings, subframe bushing inserts, Bilstein B4, ceramic coated, other goodies

    Past:
    '93 525i w/ S38B36 engine/trans swap, Powerchip, 3.8L euro cam gears, billet crank hub, Sachs Sporting suspension, 3.91LS, Dinan camber plates, M5 brakes, RD sways, staggered T-stars, etc.
    '99 540i/6 Sport: Dinan stg 2 software, Dinan c/f intake, Dinan exhaust, Dinan rr swaybar, M5 brakes, UUC SS, 18in original MParallel wheels

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    2
    My Cars
    1995 BMW 840Ci
    Quote Originally Posted by m6bigdog View Post
    I'd stay away from the S38 motor.
    I have a 1991 M5 with S38B36 (owned since new) sitting along side my 1997 850 M73B54 (owned since 2004) in the garage.
    The S38B36 (high RPM HP motor) has the engine sounds to die for, however the M73B54 (torque monster) is King for cruising.
    With that, more V12 have been put into E34 chassis than L6's have been put into the E31 and for good reasons!!
    The S38, L6 engine (extremely limited production 12,200 cars 1998-1996) will cost you more than any other motor you could put into an E31 and it only has 315 Hp and 265 lb-ft of torque.
    The S62B50 V8 from the E39, M5 with 394 HP & 369 lb-ft of torque would show much more power and be a less expensive motor swap.
    Personal experience: I have chased all kinds of cars on the mountain roads of California and while the M5 may scream like a banshee at 7k RPMs as you row through the gears the 850 with the 5.4L V12 and 5-speed auto is faster despite the extra weight.
    I completely agree. It's an interesting departure, and good to know someone out there did something truly silly with their 8.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    66
    My Cars
    1985 M635CSI, 1992 850i
    I’m not certain that it’s exactly 2X more fun than the normal V-12 version, but it does look like an amazing example of skill, technical knowledge, persistence, and perhaps a bit of insanity. I like it!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    3,801
    My Cars
    Supercharged 850ci
    Does anyone have a lead on an s38 for sale? I would love to convert E32 735i manual...

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    54,749
    My Cars
    11/88 E32 750iL+98 E36M3
    On German regional Ebay: Bmw e34 M5 S38B36 Motor 5.000 € , offer no./ Anzeigennr.: 1319765094 https://www.ebay-kleinanzeigen.de/s-...65094-223-4480
    S38 are rare and expensive
    Shogun tricks and tips for the E32 series are HERE!

Similar Threads

  1. M5 Powered E36
    By sportcarm3 in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-07-2004, 02:18 PM
  2. Hartge Z4 5,0 (M5-powered)
    By Gustav in forum 1996 - 2002 Z3 (E36/7, E36/8)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-07-2003, 04:10 AM
  3. e39 M5 powered e30?
    By dysphunxion in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-08-2002, 09:54 PM
  4. Hartge "M" 3 w/ M5 power plant
    By E36 Fanatic in forum 2001 - 2006 M3 (E46)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-25-2001, 09:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •