The 0300 has more range (8-20:1, vs 10-20:1) has a larger face, reads in 1/100ths, super-shallow mount depth, and just looks better in general - but the 4110 doesn't lose calibration. That's a big one. Thoughts? Opinions?
Bigger Range is irrelevant.
If you’re outside the smaller range you are doing something way wrong. If you’re tuning from the gauge one revision will pull you inside the smaller range.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1989 535i - sold
1999 M3 Tiag/Dove - sold
1998 M3 Turbo Arctic/black - current
2004 Built motor TiAg/Black - Sold
2008 E61 19T Turbo-Wagon - current
2011 E82 135i - S85 Swap - current
1998 M3 Cosmos S54 swapped Sedan - current
1998 Turbo: PTE6870 | 1.15 ar | Hp Cover, Custom Divided T4 bottom-mount, 3.5" SS exhaust, Dual Turbosmart Compgates, Turbosmart Raceport BOV, 3.5" Treadstone Intercooler, 3.5" Vibrant resonator and muffler, Arp 2k Headstuds | Arp 2k Main studs | 87mm Je pistons | Eagle rods | 9.2:1 static compression, Ces 87mm cutring, Custom solid rear subframe bushings, Akg 85d diff bushings, 4 clutch 3.15 diff, , Poly engine mounts, UUC trans mounts W/ enforcers, 22RPD OBD2 Stock ECU id1700 E85 tune, 22RPD Big power Transmission swap w/ GS6-53
OK, so you addessed the first 5 words of my post but didn’t actually offer any insight to either of these two gauges. I’m guessing you’ve used neither.
1989 535i - sold
1999 M3 Tiag/Dove - sold
1998 M3 Turbo Arctic/black - current
2004 Built motor TiAg/Black - Sold
2008 E61 19T Turbo-Wagon - current
2011 E82 135i - S85 Swap - current
1998 M3 Cosmos S54 swapped Sedan - current
1998 Turbo: PTE6870 | 1.15 ar | Hp Cover, Custom Divided T4 bottom-mount, 3.5" SS exhaust, Dual Turbosmart Compgates, Turbosmart Raceport BOV, 3.5" Treadstone Intercooler, 3.5" Vibrant resonator and muffler, Arp 2k Headstuds | Arp 2k Main studs | 87mm Je pistons | Eagle rods | 9.2:1 static compression, Ces 87mm cutring, Custom solid rear subframe bushings, Akg 85d diff bushings, 4 clutch 3.15 diff, , Poly engine mounts, UUC trans mounts W/ enforcers, 22RPD OBD2 Stock ECU id1700 E85 tune, 22RPD Big power Transmission swap w/ GS6-53
Range, aesthetics, aesthetics, aesthetics, calibration. I vote # 2. I like mine and like Vollosso mentioned the extra range isn't necessary unless you have problems and you need more reassurance of said problems.
I have the bimmerworld plastic steering column gauge pod and had to trim a bit of it to make this gauge fit w/ wiring. If you're placing the gauges elsewhere or using the Rallyroad gauge pod this may not be an issue as far as sizing.
I also wanted it to better match the AEM Truboost next to it so I went for the 4110
Last edited by SCapelo; 04-07-2018 at 03:10 PM.
97 Turbo 3.2L M3 - Cutring / ARP - RSI Top Mount - Gt4088r - ID1300 - Tial WG - 22RPD Tuned - 93 Octane - 3.5" Stainless
Having a larger face means it’s easier to read - that’s not aesthetics. And how is greater resolution an aesthetics thing? And then here you are talking about how you bought the 4110 because it matched your gauges, THAT’S aesthetics. Yeah, it’s all lost on me. Holy hell what a bunch of hypocritical idiots in this place.
For what its worth, i have an AEM Failsafe WBO2 and when the car is running at 14.7, the gauge actually reads 14.4.
This seems to be a common issue with this particular gauge that AEM fail to recognise and address. I dont know about the rest of the gauge range, but something to consider.
My innovate lc-2 was always perfect, and matched what the narrowband/fuel trims inidcated. I had both WBO2 running just to test and sure enough, the lc-2 read 14.7 while the aem read 14.4. Same power source, same ground point.
I’ve compared four different wide bands, with new and used snsors and gotten four different readings from 10’s to 13’s. It’s troubling. One was the 30-4110 AEM and one was the AEM failsafe.
Last edited by chikinhed; 04-08-2018 at 08:07 PM.
Bookmarks