Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Am I crazy?

  1. #1
    RRSperry's Avatar
    RRSperry is offline Senior Moment Member BMW E36 M3 Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Eldersburg, Md
    Posts
    12,369
    My Cars
    95 ///M3sc, '21 C8 HTC

    Am I crazy?

    As most know, I'm an original owner. (pretty rare these days.) I've done a lot of stuff to the car over the years, but I'm getting really tired of what I"ve turned it into. The ltw flywheel is driving me nuts. The 6 speed e46M3 transmission sounds horrible at idle, and with the marbles in a can Vortech sounds added to it, it shounds like a old junk pile...lol Not to mention the center support bearing clunking Yes, I replaced that when I did the 6 speed swap, but maybe I didn't get that right. Maybe it's the CV joint or the connection of the two 1/2's of the shaft...

    Would I be crazy to replace the flywheel with a stock dual mass, and remove the SC? (It's not like the car is actaully fast with 320 Hp anyway, besides I've got a new C7 corvette for fast.. Man is that a STUNNING CAR...) I'd stay with the 3.38 and the six speed, the brakes, and suspension.
    No matter where you go, there you are...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Surf City, NC
    Posts
    1,327
    My Cars
    1995 Dakar M3
    Your not crazy, should have left the car near stock and been happy with it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,479
    My Cars
    1995 M3 - 2007 X5
    Not crazy, you're just growing up lol.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central IL
    Posts
    9,873
    My Cars
    E36
    I get it, you're not crazy at all.

    My exhaust gives my wife migraines (she gets them bad quite often), so she doesn't ride with me much, the car rattles at idle, and the suspension makes me cringe over every expansion joint. And now the headliner sags a tad, the rust is wanting to show even more, and little plastic bits everywhere are showing their age and making me feel like I'm driving a clunker more than a classic M

    It's all about what you want in the moment. As much as I have issues with my car, it still puts such a big smile on my face I won't sell/part/etc...yet.

    If you do swap some things off, maybe shelf them and see if in 6 months you kind of miss them?

    ..if not I'll take those annoying parts off your hands
    Last edited by Moron95M3; 12-01-2017 at 10:50 AM.
    BMW CCA Illini Chapter Vice President
    1995 M3
    - My Favorite DIY's and FAQ's



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mills River, NC
    Posts
    1,118
    My Cars
    95 M3 coupe, 97 M3 sedan
    Not crazy.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    996
    My Cars
    E36 M, E32 740i/6, 997 S
    I don't think you're crazy either. I have a light weight flywheel and it makes rev matching on the street much harder but I pretty much only drive the car back and forth to the track. The noise doesn't bother me but I can see how it would be annoying to some for sure. I have resisted modifying my exhaust and suspension and I keep coming back to the conclusion that that's probably still for the best. It would be awesome on the track but the Glen is a 5 hour drive for me...

  7. #7
    MauiM3Mania's Avatar
    MauiM3Mania is offline Observer/Master Skeptic Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Central Pacific
    Posts
    10,821
    My Cars
    88M3 99M3 04M3 ITBx16
    We all were young once.
    04M3 TiAg 69k slick-top 3 pedal
    99M3 Cosmos 61k S50B32 euro 6Spd

    88M3 AW 43k miles Project FS


    WTB: 3.5" Eurosport/Conforti CAI

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    1,222
    My Cars
    98M3/4/5 SpeedMiata
    Phew. I thought you were finally going to be selling = crazy! No, I don't think you're crazy. I've fought the urge to modify mine too much and am mostly glad I haven't. But I did a full suspension refresh with all OEM bushings, tire rods, etc. EXCEPT H+R sport springs and Koni yellows. It may handle better than stock, but stock was damn good, and it definitely rides worse. BMW got these pretty right from the get-go!
    Current:
    98 M3/4/5 Alpine/Magma
    05 MazdaSpeed Miata

    Sold:

    00 Honda VFR
    99 528iT M/T
    98 M3/4/5 Arctic/Dove
    94 R-package Miata
    89 Honda NT650

    87 325is turned SpecE30

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida and ATL
    Posts
    8,385
    My Cars
    1999 M3 and 1990 Jetta G
    Remove the charger and transmission. Sell and Go back to stock on both or try the dual mass that may help the issues that bother you.
    Last edited by propcar; 12-01-2017 at 06:08 PM.
    TRM Coilovers 670F/895R | BBS LM | Corsa RSC36

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,412
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    I am only 52 and admitted to myself a year or two ago that I overmodded my 99M3, but mine is way more modded than the OP’s car. And even today, I would have no interest in it if it did not have 500 rwhp. I still drive it 6k miles a year, but am thinking of softening up a few bushings and maybe doing a 6 speed conversion with shorter carbon fiber drveshaft to get rid of the clunky and vibrating driveshaft shop shaft (I twist stock shafts in 2).

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oakhurst, CA
    Posts
    6,683
    My Cars
    96 M3 97 M3 98 M3 99 M3
    The charger should not be causing any extra unwanted noise, just the mild whine. Sounds like a failure or install issue.

    Absolutely agree on the trans. I hated going with the LTW flywheel on the 420g. Go OEM E46 M3 DMF and self adjusting clutch kit. It will hold the power just fine and make it quiet again.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Whidbey Island, WA
    Posts
    576
    My Cars
    1998 Techno M3 Coupe
    You running an aluminum LTW flywheel? There is a middle ground if you want to stay with a single mass unit.
    JB Racing makes a nice steel single mass. Not as quiet as stock but better than aluminum. I run it with Redline MTL and have no complaints.
    As for the SG, most I've heard just whine (which can also be annoying).

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    Crazy for not going turbo.
    Then the C7 would be the slow one.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oakhurst, CA
    Posts
    6,683
    My Cars
    96 M3 97 M3 98 M3 99 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by JitteryJoe View Post
    You running an aluminum LTW flywheel? There is a middle ground if you want to stay with a single mass unit.
    JB Racing makes a nice steel single mass. Not as quiet as stock but better than aluminum. I run it with Redline MTL and have no complaints.
    As for the SG, most I've heard just whine (which can also be annoying).
    Only DMF work quietly with the 420G. There is no middle ground.

    The V1 and Powerdyne units whine. V2 and V3 are rather quiet. VF wasn’t around to offer a V1 new if I recall correctly.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    528
    My Cars
    '98 M3/4/5
    You're not crazy at all. I'd like to think I didn't over modify my car, but I regret the LTW flywheel pretty badly. Can't wait to get rid of it. Everyone has a line when it comes to these things, and clearly those lines can change.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mills River, NC
    Posts
    1,118
    My Cars
    95 M3 coupe, 97 M3 sedan
    Seriously, I think a lightweight flywheel is one of the worst mods for these cars if it's to remain street driven. You give up a lot of smoothness for very little performance gain.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,412
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    I really liked the AA 12 lb (13 with bolts) LTW flywheel that I ran when my 99M3 has a Vortech. Not as light as the 8 lb UUC and I used an 850 rpm idle speed. I once tried a tune with a stock idle speed and it was miserable. This is with the ZF320 so I don’t know how the 420G would compare. I also had a V2 Vortech. The V1 have straight cut gears and are noisier at idle.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    6,481
    My Cars
    E30 E36 E46 E90
    No. I hate LTW flywheels. Dump the SC. If you really want that power, stick an S54 in, otherwise, the S50 is adequate. (Or if you prefer to stay E36, the euro motor is *very* nice.)
    2011 M3 Sedan
    2006 GMC Sierra 2500HD LBZ
    1999 323i GTS2
    1995 M3 - S50B32/S6S420G/3.91
    1990 325is
    1989 M3 - S54B32/GS6-37BZ

    Hers: 1996 Porsche 911 Turbo
    Hers: 1989 325iX


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    453
    My Cars
    97 Estoril M3/4/5
    Return to stock and wait for 2020 to import a Euro 95? That way you can get the increased horse power and six speed without the downsides you mentioned.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    2,680
    My Cars
    95 M3, 87 535is
    I would take it as a compliment saying that you're only starting to get old now RR.

    Rebuild the supercharger, install DMF, and fix driveshaft. Civilized and still quick.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Arida Zona
    Posts
    30,122
    My Cars
    z3
    Not a fan of the noise of my LTW flywheel either, and given that you are the original owner having the car in original condition is probably best

    A bit like owning an e30 m3 as prices start to rise... Aftermarket parts started falling off those cars in favor of stock setups. More "pebble beach" and less "SEMA"

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5,645
    My Cars
    E28, 97' M3/4
    Not crazy. I did the same thing. My setup was worse because I did the Bimmerworld Strapless (unsprung) Clutch/Flywheel setup. Became a pain in the ass to drive the car in traffic; wasnt bad but at the same time there were times you just werent in the mood to drive the light switch clutch. Everyone that drove it hated to drive it because they all stalled repeatedly.

    I purchased pbonsalbs' V2 blower/full kit from him a few years back and had it on for a while. It really was fun but Ive taken it off and as of now it sits. I actually liked the car alot when I went back to NA (still had cams and manifold from when i installed the SC left on, and upgraded the tune and injectors accordingly)

    The finishing touch for me would be getting rid of that Bimmerworld clutch and flywheel setup and putting a stock dual mass and brand new fresh Sachs clutch in. That's if I was keeping it, I have had the car for 10 years and now Id like to just sell it.
    Last edited by Grey Phox; 12-03-2017 at 12:47 PM.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    976
    My Cars
    ''95 M3, '17 M2
    I'd advocate for a nice OE suspension refresh after the SC and FW strip. Be hard to justify ditching the 6mt assuming you get it to settle. If not, ditch that too. I don't remember what you've got for brakes, but I'd probably keep any upgrade there. My point is this: get the M back to it's fresh elemental state and enjoy it for what it is - an old school analog canyon/country road car. Roll the windows down, tun off the stereo, and enjoy the connection. You've got the hyper performance latest tech car covered with the c7. Back to basics on the m3 will give you a nicely different choice of ride.

    Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    3,377
    My Cars
    97 E36M3 S54
    It's reasons like the OP mentioned that I did a susp refresh with OEM rubber, and my S54 swap uses the stock dual mass flywheel. I can't stand stupid flywheel and trans chatter "so my rpm's fly up faster! weee". Not warranted on the street at all!

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida and ATL
    Posts
    8,385
    My Cars
    1999 M3 and 1990 Jetta G
    I'm not questioning anybody's preference as to what they prefer in terms of NVH, it's however interesting to me that there's polarizing views on the subject and there's cars like the 911R where Porsche engineering has intentionally added NVH (by means of LWTFW chargeable option) to their most collectible, emotionally driven 911 in recent history.

    So I guess it depends on what you want from your motoring experience... I suppose on a daily driver, too much vibration may get annoying, in fact I'm sure it would. But for some rarely driven machines, maybe some would prefer that raw experience and some are willing pay for it... there's more than one way to be crazy!!



    Quote Originally Posted by Forbes
    Every molecule of the Porsche 911 R trembles at idle as its restless 4.0-liter flat-6 engine, which is buried within the tail of the chassis, awaits the next opportunity to whirl to redline. The uneven tremor is accompanied by a bright metallic rattle from the gearbox’s single mass flywheel that makes no attempt to harmonize with the deep growl emanating from the twin center-mounted exhaust tips.

    The awkward concerto of vibration and mechanical clatter would induce the average person to call for service, but my enthusiast-tuned ears are overjoyed. This is not a sports car for those who prefer to be insulated and isolated ― just the opposite, as the cacophony reminds me of the coarseness of Porsche’s own GT3 Cup race car as it holds on the grid.
    Quote Originally Posted by EVO
    With less sound deadening, the engine seems to fill the cabin beautifully when you start it up, neither too loud nor too quiet and with a deeper more guttural noise than an RS. Stop at some traffic lights and you can hear the reassuring rattle of the single-mass flywheel. The manual gearbox means you often opt not to shift, relying on the torque, enjoying the deep sound of the mid-range. Rev the wonderful 4-litre motor all the way to the limiter though and you are treated to the most glorious tearing, yowling, slightly metallic top end. It is a furious rush.
    Quote Originally Posted by carmagazine.co.uk
    Even in neutral the gearlever rattles like a bunch of carnival ratchets. ‘These noises are too precious to be eliminated,’ smiles Preuninger. ‘Generated by the optional single-mass flywheel, they evoke emotions. In addition, the low-inertia device takes out five kilos in weight, and it further speeds up the ultra-quick throttle response. You don’t like it? Then simply disengage the clutch.’
    Last edited by propcar; 12-05-2017 at 11:34 AM.
    TRM Coilovers 670F/895R | BBS LM | Corsa RSC36

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Am I crazy to DIY on timing belt?
    By smithk3933 in forum 1983 - 1991 (E30)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-10-2003, 05:56 PM
  2. Sell my M3 for S4: Am I crazy???
    By swmic in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 08-10-2003, 03:07 AM
  3. Am i crazy or just a player?!??!?
    By AaronM3 in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-22-2002, 02:27 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-24-2002, 08:00 PM
  5. Am i crazy to go FI?
    By Madd96///M3 in forum Forced Induction
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-09-2002, 07:43 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •