Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Spoiler Vs. Wing

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nördlich des Äquators
    Posts
    744
    My Cars
    M3TTst2Meth-K1300S-1100G

    Spoiler Vs. Wing

    ever wondered about the difference between rear-wing and rear-spoiler?

    interesting 2010 article

    link



    This weekend at Martinsville Speedway, the spoiler makes it return onto the back of Sprint Cup cars, eliminating the wing. The wing design made its debut at the 2007 spring Bristol race and made its exit at last weekend’s race at the same track.
    Prior to its elimination, drivers and fans alike did not care for the wing. Most of the reasons were in the cosmetic category in terms of car design appeal. Other reasons were more thought out in regards to affecting a car’s handling ability during a race, particularly in passing cars or making the car looser on the track.
    Bernie: Hopefully, with the extra downforce that the car with the spoiler generates, it will improve the racing so people can race side-by-side and it will make it more exciting again.

    Dan: Will going from the wing to spoiler stop cars from getting off the ground?
    Bernie: The wing was a very low lift aero foil and before the new car got implemented, NASCAR did lift-off testing with both the spoiler and the wing, and, at the time, there was no difference in the lift-off numbers. After the Ryan Newman accident last year at Talladega, NASCAR went back to the wind tunnel and did some more lift-off testing work with the wing and the spoiler and, again, there was very, very little difference. So, really, the reason why the cars fly is not because of the wing, and going back to the spoiler is not going to prevent that. The biggest problem is when the car turns, you get all this air that goes into the back, underneath the rear bumper and the underside of the car, and that just causes the rear of the car to lift.
    the obvious question:
    does a vertical, flat piece of aluminum at the end of the trunk-lid work as well or better than our fancy wings?
    seems to be good enough for the nascar boys running at 200mph

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ithaca Ny
    Posts
    392
    My Cars
    95m3/97m345/powerstroke
    The wing will provide downforce, rear spoiler or gurney flap only reduces drag.

    edit* the spoiler/flap can also reduce lift from drag, so I guess provide some downforce.

    I'm no expert and really have no idea what I'm talking about.
    Last edited by Pat533i; 11-11-2017 at 09:56 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,706
    My Cars
    Cayman S, Golf GSW, E30
    Both create downforce, wings are just much more efficient at it.

Similar Threads

  1. Front Spoiler & Rear Wings
    By cterrysgd in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-28-2005, 10:49 AM
  2. Poll: M3 w/Spoiler VS. M3 w/out Spoiler...what looks better
    By Darth Maul in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-23-2005, 09:57 PM
  3. Performance Spoilers and Wings !
    By kevinf in forum General BMW Mechanical Help sponsored by RM European Auto Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-08-2005, 11:01 AM
  4. M3 LTWT Rear Spoiler (High Wing)....Do The Replicas Perform As Well As The OEM?
    By jmciver in forum Track, Auto-X & Drag Racing sponsored by Bimmerparts.com
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-03-2005, 06:32 PM
  5. M3 spoilers or wings for "handling"!
    By M3inSC in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-14-2001, 01:04 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •