Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Vanos Dyno Curves

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Canadian in California
    Posts
    133
    My Cars
    Makes whoosh noises

    Vanos Dyno Curves

    I've never seen too many comparisons thrown out openly on this so I thought I'd share some:

    Intake Cam Comparison.jpgExhaust Cam Comparison.jpg

    It's not really shown in these graphs but the exhaust cam is pretty beneficial for the low end spool/torque. I could feel the differences more dynamically when adjusting on the road; in the future I might try to find a Mainline Dyno to verify optimal settings.
    Last edited by Commanderwiggin; 10-09-2017 at 01:21 AM.

    1000+RWHP, Lab22 Built Turbo S54 - BMW Half Mile Record Holder

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    78
    My Cars
    2001 530
    what are the actual values for each curve?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Canadian in California
    Posts
    133
    My Cars
    Makes whoosh noises
    Quote Originally Posted by stefm5 View Post
    what are the actual values for each curve?
    I've shared a small piece of that information on the images. Most configurations will be different and I'd gladly point you to my tuner if anyone with a standalone ems is interested in optimizing things remotely. Ian - bendcalibration@gmail.com

    Intake 10 degrees advance vs Optimized vs 50 degrees advance

    Exhaust 0 degrees vs -10 degrees
    Last edited by Commanderwiggin; 10-09-2017 at 02:48 AM.

    1000+RWHP, Lab22 Built Turbo S54 - BMW Half Mile Record Holder

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    PEI, Canada
    Posts
    2,817
    My Cars
    2001 330i
    Forgot to hit the "post" button 2 months ago Kenton?

    LOL

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Canadian in California
    Posts
    133
    My Cars
    Makes whoosh noises
    Quote Originally Posted by PEI330Ci View Post
    Forgot to hit the "post" button 2 months ago Kenton?

    LOL
    You know me...I share most of my stuff privately

    1000+RWHP, Lab22 Built Turbo S54 - BMW Half Mile Record Holder

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    473
    My Cars
    1999 328i -2000 323i
    Quote Originally Posted by stefm5 View Post
    what are the actual values for each curve?
    he pretty much posted them for you. the timing isn't going to be a static number across the rpm range, he posted the low and high, the rest is blended together. As he said different setups such as turbos, manifolds, headwork will yield different results

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    78
    My Cars
    2001 530
    i was curious to see the full load maps just for the strategy used. i don't even own the s54 engine.
    but you're right i got the point.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    3,372
    My Cars
    e30
    Cool graphs, thanks for sharing! Makes you lol at people who remove variable valve timing for turbo engines thinking its no benefit!!
    -Nick
    91 E30 M42 on VEMS

    Turbo Camshaft Thread

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    PEI, Canada
    Posts
    2,817
    My Cars
    2001 330i
    Quote Originally Posted by wazzu70 View Post
    Cool graphs, thanks for sharing! Makes you lol at people who remove variable valve timing for turbo engines thinking its no benefit!!
    There are actually some issues with running it with large cams.

    In some cases a camshaft can be so big that in a static position, the open and close events cover the entire range of a "stock" camshaft fully advanced and retarded. Depending on piston design, you could end up with piston to valve contact if you rotated the big camshaft.

    Secondly, there can be issues with moving the camshaft. If there isn't enough hydraulic force available, it can be next to impossible to move the camshaft to target position as RPM increases rapidly. Conversely, you could be asking the camshaft mechanisms to move at a rate faster than they were designed to do, and end up causing damage, misalignment, or component failure.

    According to Kenny Dutweiller, most people put too much camshaft in their FI engines...where optimizing the position of a mild valve train provides a better all around package.

    Personally, I think the dyno is the only place to form opinions on this topic.....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    3,376
    My Cars
    E36 Turbo
    Quote Originally Posted by PEI330Ci View Post

    Secondly, there can be issues with moving the camshaft. If there isn't enough hydraulic force available, it can be next to impossible to move the camshaft to target position as RPM increases rapidly.
    You're limited by the design of the actuators/oil pressure/supply and load on the valve train for speed... but it's not something to worry about. The time it takes is the time it takes.

    Conversely, you could be asking the camshaft mechanisms to move at a rate faster than they were designed to do, and end up causing damage, misalignment, or component failure.
    Not sure I follow.. How do you ask it to move faster? It only moves as fast is it can. I don't see how you can cause damage, failure or misalignment.

    If you're talking about a poorly setup system and the control system is bad then that is different and certainly you will never get a good result. But again I don't see how that can result in any damage to the VVT system. I've seen plenty of poorly setup VVT systems in standalone ECU's... never any damage as a result though (mechanically).

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    PEI, Canada
    Posts
    2,817
    My Cars
    2001 330i
    Quote Originally Posted by NOTORIOUS VR View Post
    You're limited by the design of the actuators/oil pressure/supply and load on the valve train for speed... but it's not something to worry about. The time it takes is the time it takes.



    Not sure I follow.. How do you ask it to move faster? It only moves as fast is it can. I don't see how you can cause damage, failure or misalignment.

    If you're talking about a poorly setup system and the control system is bad then that is different and certainly you will never get a good result. But again I don't see how that can result in any damage to the VVT system. I've seen plenty of poorly setup VVT systems in standalone ECU's... never any damage as a result though (mechanically).
    Ah..easy answers.

    I've had situations where I couldn't move the cam out of a position fast enough and it cost power. The solution is to move it only part way there, then roll out early. This had a lot to do with engine oil viscosity changes influencing the PID setting of the actuator control. (Feed forward)

    On the M54, the Vanos helix spline is not pinned to the cam, it's bolted on and can be snapped lose / moved if enough force is applied to it. 3 times now I've had situations where I've done this. Most recently, I inverted the the polarity of the Exhaust Vanos actuation (Table changed from 0% to 100% instantly) when doing a test, and the engine never ran right after that single key stroke. I tore the VANOS down to find that the helix spline on the exhaust cam had rotated causing a 23 degree misalignment in timing.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    148
    My Cars
    2004 E46 M3 Cab

    Vanos Dyno Curves

    The s54 can move cams quickly... u can actually adjust the modulation to help move the cams individually at any rpm to achieve target. Its like 2000psi... the accumulator makes sure there is always full psi on reserve so u don’t have to build psi. when I’m tuning I look at targets and actual cam degree very carefully to ensure they r achieved.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by being3; 10-13-2017 at 10:52 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Vanos seals / before and after dyno run, torque curve?
    By agentrnge in forum 1996 - 2003 (E39)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-25-2013, 10:42 AM
  2. Looking for info on relating shock dyno curves to actual driving experiences >>
    By beady in forum Track, Auto-X & Drag Racing sponsored by Bimmerparts.com
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-09-2007, 09:24 PM
  3. Looking for M50 NON-Vanos Dyno Plot!
    By MeisterKolby in forum 1991 - 1999 (E36)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-10-2006, 11:06 AM
  4. anyone compared a gtech dyno curve to a real one?
    By xjeeper in forum Car Audio & Electronics sponsored by Bavsound
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-09-2003, 07:08 PM
  5. Dyno with Vanos disconnected
    By RogRacer in forum 1992 - 1999 M3 (E36)
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-25-2002, 04:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •