Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: S50 S300 bottom mount

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes

    S50 S300 bottom mount

    I've been searching and found no clear answers on this one. I'm trying to decide what combination of manifold and turbine housing would work to bolt the Borg Warner S300 up to the S50. I'd prefer to stay with a cast manifold for reliability and also want to stay with a bottom mount for the usual reasons. The open T4 turbine seems like it would be the likely choice, but I've read that this won't work with the SPA manifold? What exactly interferes?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    I run a boostlogic bottom mount with a Borg Warner S366sxe and had to grind down the block and the compressor cover to get it to fit.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that a tubular manifold?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    Yes.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Posts
    522
    My Cars
    Turbo 350Z
    I use steed speed twin scroll with s369sxe

    '97 M3/4 3.0l "Frankenstein" 760whp
    E90 335i 6mt Sold
    '97 Jetta TDi 16v ABA swap w/ pt6266 Sold
    2004.5 350Z APS ST 475whp 505wtq Sold
    2000 323i Sold

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    I'm looking at the S300SX-E 83S74.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Renton, Wa
    Posts
    5,429
    My Cars
    98 m3
    I doubt it will fit with any of the usual cast manifolds.

    Both raj and pearlz have manifolds known for large fitment.

    Sidebar, pearlz we need to compare some logs. 369sxe vs 6870. Both twinscrolls..


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    1989 535i - sold
    1999 M3 Tiag/Dove - sold
    1998 M3 Turbo Arctic/black - current
    2004 Built motor TiAg/Black - Sold
    2008 E61 19T Turbo-Wagon - current
    2011 E82 135i - S85 Swap - current
    1998 M3 Cosmos S54 swapped Sedan - current

    1998 Turbo: PTE6870 | 1.15 ar | Hp Cover, Custom Divided T4 bottom-mount, 3.5" SS exhaust, Dual Turbosmart Compgates, Turbosmart Raceport BOV, 3.5" Treadstone Intercooler, 3.5" Vibrant resonator and muffler, Arp 2k Headstuds | Arp 2k Main studs | 87mm Je pistons | Eagle rods | 9.2:1 static compression, Ces 87mm cutring, Custom solid rear subframe bushings, Akg 85d diff bushings, 4 clutch 3.15 diff, , Poly engine mounts, UUC trans mounts W/ enforcers, 22RPD OBD2 Stock ECU id1700 E85 tune, 22RPD Big power Transmission swap w/ GS6-53

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,156
    My Cars
    E36
    running t4 spa mani with prec 62mm. Above subframe piping, stock a/c lines, and intake behind headlight. With most cast manis, I think you're stuck with garret/precision.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    An S366 is like an inch bigger in every direction than a gt35 or 6262. They are bigger than a gt4094 even.


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    Quote Originally Posted by someguy2800 View Post
    An S366 is like an inch bigger in every direction than a gt35 or 6262. They are bigger than a gt4094 even.
    It's massive lol

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    Is it the webbing in the block that interferes or is it the compressor housing vs the exhaust manifold? Obviously the latter can be dealt with using a spacer. The former, perhaps using one at the head.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    For me it was the compressor cover interfering with the block. I had to grind the shit out of the block and the cover and it still barely fits.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    Any chance you have any pictures? Obviously grinding the block isn't my first preference.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,156
    My Cars
    E36
    I feel like the interest in borgwarners has increased recently. Is it the cost or are there performance gains?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    They perform well, they are probably the most reliable turbo on the market, and they are cheap.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,156
    My Cars
    E36
    Quote Originally Posted by rajicase View Post
    They perform well, they are probably the most reliable turbo on the market, and they are cheap.
    Good to know. If my revised ccv and addition of pump for oil drain don't fix my oil in piping issue, then this could be a possibility. Compression is fine so could be turbo seals.

    Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    Every manifold has the outlet flange in a different location so just because it doesn't fit with one doesn't mean it won't fit with another. Have to find someone that has tried it.


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    With pictures I was hoping to figure out what needed to be done for fitment. I didn't really want to go tubular for reliability sake. I'm not sure if welding a flange on a cast manifold is a more or less reliable option though.

    As far as the interest, I can't really speak for others. I was just looking around and saw the matchbot function which provided more info than I had seen previously. I'm more familiar with Garrett stuff, but after comparing them I certainly see the advantages with the Borg Warner in my instance. I wasn't planning to do a full engine build on this car and was just looking for around 5-600hp while keeping boost response as reasonable as possible. The S300SX-E 83S74 looks like it should be able to make ~20 psi at 3000 RPM which is plenty responsive yet still not go off the map at redline.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    You keep saying you don't want a tubular manifold cause of reliability ? Okay, don't get an eBay manifold and that won't be an issue. My boostlogic has been on at least three engines, had at least 4 different turbos on it, and at least 50k miles, likely more as I am not the original owner.

    SPA manifolds crack too.

    I have not heard of anyone running a s3xx on a SPA manifold or any cast manifold.
    Last edited by rajicase; 07-19-2017 at 04:26 PM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    Quote Originally Posted by rajicase View Post
    You keep saying you don't want a tubular manifold cause of reliability ? Okay, don't get an eBay manifold and that won't be an issue. My boostlogic has been on at least three engines, had at least 4 different turbos on it, and at least 50k miles, likely more as I am not the original owner.

    SPA manifolds crack too.

    I have not heard of anyone running a s3xx on a SPA manifold or any cast manifold.
    I definitely know better than to buy an ebay tubular manifold. If I have to go tubular I'll probably have a friend make it for me and go with a twin scroll (my welding skills are not on par with his). I also want to keep the (working) A/C so that sort of limits how elaborate I can get with the manifold.

    I might just have to buy the turbo and see how it fits. Part of me thinks an adapter plate might be a viable solution just to rotate the turbo or to point the inlet more toward the passenger side so the compressor housing clears the block.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    The way I see it is you can spend a bunch of money on a manifold to run a cheap turbo, or spend a bunch of money on a turbo to run a cheap manifold.


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    8,369
    My Cars
    1995 BMW M3
    Quote Originally Posted by someguy2800 View Post
    The way I see it is you can spend a bunch of money on a manifold to run a cheap turbo, or spend a bunch of money on a turbo to run a cheap manifold.
    Why can't you have both a good turbo and manifold?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    Quote Originally Posted by someguy2800 View Post
    The way I see it is you can spend a bunch of money on a manifold to run a cheap turbo, or spend a bunch of money on a turbo to run a cheap manifold.
    Every project needs constraints and a budget if you ever hope to see it on the road. The key in my mind is not to over-build the neighborhood so to speak.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,156
    My Cars
    E36
    Overbuild now, thank us later. Boost is crack

    Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

  25. #25
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    162
    My Cars
    yes
    Quote Originally Posted by bmw328m52 View Post
    Overbuild now, thank us later. Boost is crack

    Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
    This isn't my first rodeo.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Cast T3 Bottom mount Manifold M50 M52 S50 S52
    By Piner in forum Forced & Chemical Induction Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-03-2015, 02:55 AM
  2. FS: S50 Turbo parts, 666 bottom mount, Dual Diaphram Clutchnet kit
    By Lazr111 in forum Forced & Chemical Induction Parts
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 06-18-2015, 02:16 PM
  3. Brand New Spa T4 Bottom Mount Turbo Manifold for 24v E36's (m50 m52 s50 s52)
    By m3mods in forum Forced & Chemical Induction Parts
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-23-2014, 06:04 PM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-11-2003, 10:51 AM
  5. Momo bottom-mount seat rails for Z3
    By CoMZ302 in forum 1996 - 2002 Z3 (E36/7, E36/8)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-14-2003, 08:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •