Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 38

Thread: Connecting rods, M50NV vs M52 with pics

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Keokuk, Ia
    Posts
    84
    My Cars
    m50 turbo w123, 4g63 e30

    Connecting rods, M50NV vs M52 with pics

    I have heard people talk on the forums about the nv rods being stronger, but I didn't know how much of a difference there was until I took a few of my parts engines apart to build a new one. I figured you guys would enjoy some pics for a direct comparison

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    shhhhhhhh!! Its a secret!


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Manchester, N.H.
    Posts
    16,712
    My Cars
    96 332IS 6466 turbo
    135 vs 140 correct ? The big boys are 140mm rods ?
    1996 332IS
    Built 3.2
    CES/Steed TS Precision 6466, spraying a "$π!℅" load of meth.
    Technique Tuning 80# tune.
    1/4 mile 10.84 @ 136.72
    Your 1 and only stop for all your BMW performance needs
    WWW.CESMOTORSPORT.COM

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    non vanos is 135, vanos is 140. Non vanos rods will drop right in an m52, s50, s52.


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Keokuk, Ia
    Posts
    84
    My Cars
    m50 turbo w123, 4g63 e30
    Quote Originally Posted by someguy2800 View Post
    non vanos is 135, vanos is 140. Non vanos rods will drop right in an m52, s50, s52.
    Correct, I just double checked and they both measure the same.

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Keokuk, Ia
    Posts
    84
    My Cars
    m50 turbo w123, 4g63 e30
    Has anybody found the limits of these rods? Im about to put them in my engine with wiseco pistons and hope to make atleast 600whp. I've been through several sets of pistons in the low to mid 500whp range but never hurt any stock rod

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    8,162
    My Cars
    '97 M3
    What is the weight of the M50 NV compared to Eagles?
    '97 M3, Estoril blue, 2 dr, euro 6-spd, EFR 9180 divided T4 .92 IWG, RK tuning, CP 8.5:1 pistons, Eagle rods, Schrick cams, L19 11 mm ARP studs, O-ringed block, Supertech stainless/inconel valves, Supertech springs & Ti retainers, ported head, S54 oil pump/pan, 80 lb. injectors, OBD1 intake manifold, Steedspeed twin scroll T4, 3.5" SS exhaust, eBoost2 EBC, HFS-4 W/M injection, AEM Failsafe, Zeitronix data logger, Racelogic TC, OpenOBC w. ethanol %, Ireland Eng. engine mounts, UUC black tranny mounts w. enforcers, UUC twin disc feramic, ARC-8's, MCS 2-ways, Z3 rack, Rallyroad strut bar, X brace, Eibach sway bars, Ground Control LCAB bushings, Bimmerworld RTAB's, Powerflex subframe bushings, 210 4-clutch LSD, Stoptech BBK, titainium shims, steel braided lines, brake cooling ducts.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    I am making about 800 whp with them and an m52 crank with wiseco pistons. Non vanos rods are 653 grams, eagles are 540.


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Keokuk, Ia
    Posts
    84
    My Cars
    m50 turbo w123, 4g63 e30
    That's what I like to hear!

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    333
    God damn those NV rods are beefy in comparison


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    1,154
    My Cars
    M3
    Yep soon a set will cost 800$ Better buy 10 sets right now.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    3,043
    My Cars
    97' m52 turbo
    Makes me wonder why people usually say go m52 instead of m50

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,411
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    The M52 gives more displacement to make torque and spool a turbo and the rods are still good for 500 lbs rwtq. I think an M50 is a good choice in a lighter car like an E30 or a gutted E36, but in a full weight E36 that is street driven, I'd like more displacement -- ideally S52.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    358
    My Cars
    2003 330i ZHP
    So I have a friend who works in parts for a BMW dealership and I'll drop him a line to see what these NV M50 rods run new. What model/years should I be looking for?

    - - - Updated - - -

    YIKES, never mind. Rods for an 1992 e36 325i dealer cost is $147/ea = $882. Junkyard would be the only reasonable choice over a set of lighter/stronger aftermarket rods.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Manchester, N.H.
    Posts
    16,712
    My Cars
    96 332IS 6466 turbo
    Quote Originally Posted by boostd4 View Post
    So I have a friend who works in parts for a BMW dealership and I'll drop him a line to see what these NV M50 rods run new. What model/years should I be looking for?

    - - - Updated - - -

    YIKES, never mind. Rods for an 1992 e36 325i dealer cost is $147/ea = $882. Junkyard would be the only reasonable choice over a set of lighter/stronger aftermarket rods.
    What's the part # ?
    1996 332IS
    Built 3.2
    CES/Steed TS Precision 6466, spraying a "$π!℅" load of meth.
    Technique Tuning 80# tune.
    1/4 mile 10.84 @ 136.72
    Your 1 and only stop for all your BMW performance needs
    WWW.CESMOTORSPORT.COM

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    3,880
    My Cars
    Twin turbo LS E36 M3
    11241730420
    328i Sedan Twin s366's, 6.0LS, TH400, MS3 Ultimate
    9.20 at 150 on 22psi

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,411
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    So these are 1992 only rods?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    358
    My Cars
    2003 330i ZHP
    I just guessed on the 92 325i. Rods should be similar cost across most non M motors so I gave up after finding they were $150/ea. Someone please correct me on which models/years the NV M50 came in.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    They came in 92 325i E36 and also 91-92 E34 525i. You also get the excellent M50 non vanos valvetrain with the deal. I don't really see it making sense buying them new from bmw vs just getting eagles but if you happen across a non vanos m50 for cheap enough keep the head and the rods out of it.


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Manchester, N.H.
    Posts
    16,712
    My Cars
    96 332IS 6466 turbo
    There is a set on eBay right now for $119 with pistons.
    New are $157 each
    1996 332IS
    Built 3.2
    CES/Steed TS Precision 6466, spraying a "$π!℅" load of meth.
    Technique Tuning 80# tune.
    1/4 mile 10.84 @ 136.72
    Your 1 and only stop for all your BMW performance needs
    WWW.CESMOTORSPORT.COM

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    358
    My Cars
    2003 330i ZHP
    So.... the CX Racing ones are ~$300/set... (?) I guess these are a good find for the UBER budget minded... For <$200 more you get forged H-beams?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,411
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    The M50 NV rods look like a good bang for the buck option though at 650g each, you are adding 2 lbs to the rotating mass over K1 rods, which are 500g each.

    No one here has tried the cheaper asian rods like the ones CX Racing and others sell. It is possible they come from the same factory as Eagle or K1 but may not get the same finishing or quality control.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    The stock rods are also forged so I guess you have to choose between a rod forged and machined by germans, or forged and machined by children in some third world jungle. All the eagle's, molnars, K1's ect... are also forged in china but at least you can bet the clearances will likely be right since they are sized in the US and use american fasteners.

    Another thing to note about non vanos rods is they have a strange undercut on the rod bolts so if you are going to spin them above 7200 rpms you may want to get ARP rod bolts for them. I have ARP rod bolts in mine and I shift at 8000 to as high as 8400 rpms. Also on 100% stock non vanos valvetrain.

    Here is a couple pictures next to an M52 rod I took a long time ago





    From left to right, M20b27, M50, M52, K1 H beam, Howards aluminum



    M50, M52, K1 H beam, Howards aluminum



    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    25,411
    My Cars
    F90 M5; E36 M3 Turbo
    That M50B27 rod looks even beefier than the M50B25NV rod.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota eh?
    Posts
    6,155
    My Cars
    86 325es
    It isn't, they are really spindly in side profile. Also the length is 130mm. M20b25 rods are 135mm and similar design but also very thin


    86 325es, 2.8L m50, S476sxe, ProEFI 128 ecu, e85, solid rear axle, TH400 trans, 28x10.5w slicks, zip ties, popsicle sticks, tape
    best time 9.06 @ 151.8 mph, best 60 foot 1.30

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Molnar 135mm Connecting Rods S50/S52/M52/M54
    By enigmaticdream in forum Forced & Chemical Induction Parts
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-06-2016, 09:59 PM
  2. Brake Upgrade Comparison E31 vs E38 (with pics))
    By SpeedsterBek in forum 1988 - 1996 (E34)
    Replies: 146
    Last Post: 03-31-2015, 10:49 PM
  3. S38 vs. 2JZ with pics
    By Scout8847 in forum Forced Induction
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 03-02-2013, 09:52 PM
  4. m50 vs m52 specs, with pics
    By 95325i5sp in forum 1991 - 1999 (E36)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-20-2011, 07:55 PM
  5. stock connecting rods M52 vs S52
    By bmwgta in forum Forced Induction
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-09-2010, 01:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •