Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 59

Thread: So, just how much better are MCS double adjustables vs Koni's?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3

    So, just how much better are MCS double adjustables vs Koni's?

    I have the Ground Control single adjustable kit on my 98 M3 now. With their camber plates, rear shock mounts etc. Seems to be working fine, as much as my amateur butt can tell.

    My plan was to upgrade to some sort of double adjustables at some point. Well, when I got my lap times down to certain levels at my local tracks really. I'm not quite at those levels yet, but a set of MCS adjustables popped up used locally.

    They're still, um, kinda expensive though, which makes me pause. Just how much better are these? In other words, is my amateur ass going to be able to tell an immediate difference and be able to exploit that and see a significant drop in my lap times?
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    1,796
    My Cars
    95 M3 & Legacy Manwagon
    Quote Originally Posted by DocWyte View Post
    is my amateur ass going to be able to tell an immediate difference

    Yes. Especially chassis control and large bump/impact control (i.e. kerbs)

    Quote Originally Posted by DocWyte View Post
    and be able to exploit that and see a significant drop in my lap times?
    Most likely no, not immediately.

    I went from tired but functioning TCK DA to MCS DA (non-remote) and my lap times stayed exactly the same for a few events. However: car control was improved, bump control is absurdly good, the damper adjustments are discrete and noticeable, and I wasn't fighting the car nearly as much. Lap time improvement over already good suspension was negligible, but the way it went around the track was phenomenally different even with a hack driving it. I've had a few friends drive the car who are competitive TTers (with TCKs) and they notice a large difference between TCK and MCS on equivalently set up E36s.

    The TCKs were a (much) better dual duty setup. The MCSs are fantastic on track but I'm not thrilled with their street manners.

    Ultimately...if what you have isn't holding you back appreciably, don't bother spending the money. My TCKs weren't holding me back and I fully admit falling victim to oooh shiny syndrome, but the MCSs are awesome so...no regrets.
    "Fear disturbs your concentration" -Sabine Schmit

    1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54 + Mk60 DSC, California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
    1998 BMW M3/4/5 Alpine/Modena, Z3 Rack, otherwise stock-- DD without burbles
    2017 Chevy SS, Orange Blast Metallic, 6MT -- DD with burbles

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3
    Why don't you like the MCS for street duty?
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    1,796
    My Cars
    95 M3 & Legacy Manwagon
    Quote Originally Posted by DocWyte View Post
    Why don't you like the MCS for street duty?
    I don't dislike them. I just would not buy them if your priorities favor street manners heavily or over track performance.

    They aren't as comfortable. They're a race part, and even turned down to soft, at similar spring rates, they're stiffer and less compliant on the road. They do not soak up the tiny high frequency stuff as well as the Konis, which are floatier (again, race car part, so this is expected). Note: on the MCSs you can set them up to be so underdamped as to porpoise down the road, i.e. full soft is too soft. The adjustment range is huge but I still haven't found a street setting I'm happy with.

    The beauty of the MCSs is you can turn them down to 'meh, good enough I guess' levels for street use and then turn them back up to 'holy crap this is magic' levels on track.

    The TCKs, in contrast, go from 'wow, this is really comfy' to 'wow, this is really fast' levels.

    The best I can describe: TCK's special sauce is their trackable street damping, while MCS's special sauce is their streetable track damping.
    Last edited by Bimmerman535i; 01-24-2017 at 01:20 PM.
    "Fear disturbs your concentration" -Sabine Schmit

    1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54 + Mk60 DSC, California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
    1998 BMW M3/4/5 Alpine/Modena, Z3 Rack, otherwise stock-- DD without burbles
    2017 Chevy SS, Orange Blast Metallic, 6MT -- DD with burbles

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3
    Ok, gotcha.

    Which kinda leads me to my next question. How hard is it to dial in the MCS dampening rates on the track and how do you quantify where to set them? Or is it "Call your local BMW race shop and ask them where to set them?"
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    1,796
    My Cars
    95 M3 & Legacy Manwagon
    Quote Originally Posted by DocWyte View Post
    Ok, gotcha.

    Which kinda leads me to my next question. How hard is it to dial in the MCS dampening rates on the track and how do you quantify where to set them? Or is it "Call your local BMW race shop and ask them where to set them?"
    How much experience do you have adjusting your GCs?

    There are rough guidelines for setting the MCSs up, but honestly it's on the driver to determine whether adjusting rebound/compression will solve under/oversteer conditions on your local track. Calling the raceshop will get you in the ballpark but fine tuning really can't be done by anyone else but you, on track, in your car, on your tires/springs/bars/etc. MCS publishes baseline settings on their website, which is a good starting point at the very least. This is much more of a feel than a quantified data-driven science without significant data acquisition experience and expense.

    If you don't feel familiar with the cause-> effect -> adjustment loop on your single adjustable GCs, the MCSs are probably overkill.
    "Fear disturbs your concentration" -Sabine Schmit

    1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54 + Mk60 DSC, California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
    1998 BMW M3/4/5 Alpine/Modena, Z3 Rack, otherwise stock-- DD without burbles
    2017 Chevy SS, Orange Blast Metallic, 6MT -- DD with burbles

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    MD, USA
    Posts
    570
    My Cars
    2005 M3 Coupe
    Another option for setup is to hire a pro coach for the day that also does car setup. At the open track days I've run you can get a few hours of an instructors time for under $1000 which is worth it when you're talking about setup on a $6000+ set of double adjustable MCS coils.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    1,796
    My Cars
    95 M3 & Legacy Manwagon
    Quote Originally Posted by dmw16 View Post
    Another option for setup is to hire a pro coach for the day that also does car setup. At the open track days I've run you can get a few hours of an instructors time for under $1000 which is worth it when you're talking about setup on a $6000+ set of double adjustable MCS coils.
    Also a great option for both driver and chassis development. You still will want to know what fiddling with the knobs does, but at least this way you'd have a tailored baseline to go back to.
    "Fear disturbs your concentration" -Sabine Schmit

    1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54 + Mk60 DSC, California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
    1998 BMW M3/4/5 Alpine/Modena, Z3 Rack, otherwise stock-- DD without burbles
    2017 Chevy SS, Orange Blast Metallic, 6MT -- DD with burbles

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    2,923
    I feel like the MCS range of adjustment is way wider. There are certainly some tracks and conditions that you may be just very well suited for with what you have. For example, I was at MidO supporting a customer racing in IP years ago and there was another very good racer that was dead even - until it rained and we had the range to soften up the car and smoked him by seconds a lap. I am confident it was suspension, not driver. That track specifically will work with softer springs, and his dampers were good at controlling those softer springs well in the typical range for a typical day. Go outside that box and things change. Track conditions change - a different setup works better and the damper got us there. And for most of the tracks we go to, more spring is better and the MCS controls that heavier rate better while still keeping the car compliant - for both driver comfort and grip.

    We have a baseline (different than the manufacturer recommended) we send out when we sell dampers, but not when people just call us up I consider it IP, and I have spent a lot of time learning how to set up cars in general, and specifically with a range of MCS setups, and it has value. Typically someone might end up a few clicks away from our baseline for the typical track/setup, but it is really close, and we provide post-sale support to dial it in and teach you how to. Typically with a better damper, and the right baseline, I would expect someone upgrading from a lesser damper to immediately be better off - If you pay a shop to put an S54 in your E36, it's faster, even if you didn't do the work or know how they did it. That being said, I think part of progressing as a driver is learning to break down handling issues and you would be well-served to learn the process.

    James Clay
    Race Proven Performance
    www.bimmerworld.com
    www.bimmerworldracing.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    1,796
    My Cars
    95 M3 & Legacy Manwagon
    Doc-- will return call this afternoon/evening

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesclay View Post
    I feel like the MCS range of adjustment is way wider. There are certainly some tracks and conditions that you may be just very well suited for with what you have. For example, I was at MidO supporting a customer racing in IP years ago and there was another very good racer that was dead even - until it rained and we had the range to soften up the car and smoked him by seconds a lap. I am confident it was suspension, not driver. That track specifically will work with softer springs, and his dampers were good at controlling those softer springs well in the typical range for a typical day. Go outside that box and things change. Track conditions change - a different setup works better and the damper got us there. And for most of the tracks we go to, more spring is better and the MCS controls that heavier rate better while still keeping the car compliant - for both driver comfort and grip.

    We have a baseline (different than the manufacturer recommended) we send out when we sell dampers, but not when people just call us up I consider it IP, and I have spent a lot of time learning how to set up cars in general, and specifically with a range of MCS setups, and it has value. Typically someone might end up a few clicks away from our baseline for the typical track/setup, but it is really close, and we provide post-sale support to dial it in and teach you how to. Typically with a better damper, and the right baseline, I would expect someone upgrading from a lesser damper to immediately be better off - If you pay a shop to put an S54 in your E36, it's faster, even if you didn't do the work or know how they did it. That being said, I think part of progressing as a driver is learning to break down handling issues and you would be well-served to learn the process.

    I agree with this-- as an example, a week after breaking in the rod bearings on my S54 swap I did an HPDE with the GGC chapter at Thunderhill, and set the knobs to Bimmerworld's recommended settings. Car worked great, I liked it, instructors liked it, buddy loved it, good day was had. I intentionally didn't fiddle with the knobs during the day. Second day, first two sessions were rainy and drying. I set the suspension to the BW 'rain' settings and dear god the thing grips. Most everyone else in the session was sliding and all over the place, my car was hooked up remarkably well. As the day dried out I progressively went back towards the dry settings and the car was just great all day. Awesome awesome track suspension.

    Bimmerworld (and James') support has also been fantastic post-sale. I still have qualms (read: stiff ride even set to 'soft') with the suspension for street use, but I bought (fantastic) racecar parts for a car that sees lots of track use, so it's to be expected.
    "Fear disturbs your concentration" -Sabine Schmit

    1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54 + Mk60 DSC, California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
    1998 BMW M3/4/5 Alpine/Modena, Z3 Rack, otherwise stock-- DD without burbles
    2017 Chevy SS, Orange Blast Metallic, 6MT -- DD with burbles

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    8,162
    My Cars
    '97 M3
    What are their recommended wet and dry settings?
    '97 M3, Estoril blue, 2 dr, euro 6-spd, EFR 9180 divided T4 .92 IWG, RK tuning, CP 8.5:1 pistons, Eagle rods, Schrick cams, L19 11 mm ARP studs, O-ringed block, Supertech stainless/inconel valves, Supertech springs & Ti retainers, ported head, S54 oil pump/pan, 80 lb. injectors, OBD1 intake manifold, Steedspeed twin scroll T4, 3.5" SS exhaust, eBoost2 EBC, HFS-4 W/M injection, AEM Failsafe, Zeitronix data logger, Racelogic TC, OpenOBC w. ethanol %, Ireland Eng. engine mounts, UUC black tranny mounts w. enforcers, UUC twin disc feramic, ARC-8's, MCS 2-ways, Z3 rack, Rallyroad strut bar, X brace, Eibach sway bars, Ground Control LCAB bushings, Bimmerworld RTAB's, Powerflex subframe bushings, 210 4-clutch LSD, Stoptech BBK, titainium shims, steel braided lines, brake cooling ducts.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3
    Bimmerman535, looking forward to hearing from you
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    1,796
    My Cars
    95 M3 & Legacy Manwagon
    @Doc-- just got home, will call tomorrow. sorry!

    Quote Originally Posted by chikinhed View Post
    What are their recommended wet and dry settings?
    Per James' post, that's their IP.
    "Fear disturbs your concentration" -Sabine Schmit

    1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54 + Mk60 DSC, California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
    1998 BMW M3/4/5 Alpine/Modena, Z3 Rack, otherwise stock-- DD without burbles
    2017 Chevy SS, Orange Blast Metallic, 6MT -- DD with burbles

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Parker, Colorado
    Posts
    3,128
    My Cars
    GTS3 E36, 97 M3/4/5
    Quote Originally Posted by DocWyte View Post
    I'm not quite at those levels yet, but a set of MCS adjustables popped up used locally. They're still, um, kinda expensive though, which makes me pause. Just how much better are these? In other words, is my amateur ass going to be able to tell an immediate difference and be able to exploit that and see a significant drop in my lap times?
    Those local dampers are priced very nicely. I've been considering them as well. Another local GTS2 car has the MCS doubles. We got them dialed in during an open lapping day (I was standing at turn 10 at PMP watching the car come through the turn and then suggested we make some changes... that's how it started). Part of it was seat time (how does the car feel, what does it do and where, how does the driver feel), part of it was watching the car through certain corners (bouncing? sliding? Over / Under steer), and a lot of it was data. We just upped the spring rates last month (video and data supported this) and will be hitting the track again soon to start checking all of the items we went through last time (seat, visual, data) and dialing them back in.

    The nice thing about the MCS doubles (or any quality adjustable damper) is the ability to adjust based on the track. Bumpy track vs. smooth track. Rain vs. dry. A log book will become very handy when you start manipulating settings. On your car, I ran AST 4200s on the street and track. I had a log book for every track with temps, weather, tire pressures, shock settings. I would dial the shocks back when on the street, then pull out the log book when I hit the track so I knew what my starting point was for the day / weekend.

    James brings up a lot of really good points (including the IP of settings and rent-a-coach). I hear he likes HPR.

    If I had $2500 sitting in my pocket right now, those MCS' would be in my garage I'll probably hold off until next year and then dump the two sets of AST 4200s I have and pick up some MCS doubles with remotes or JRZ doubles.
    Last edited by John in Houston; 01-25-2017 at 09:21 AM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    2,538
    My Cars
    e28, Spec3, M3, M3, ZHP
    Quote Originally Posted by chikinhed View Post
    What are their recommended wet and dry settings?
    Sigh...you must not be good at reading or something...if you want to specs go buy the suspension kit and get all the assistance that comes along with purchasing from bimmerworld.
    Andrew Elmore

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC Ca
    Posts
    3,255
    My Cars
    1993 325is
    Quote Originally Posted by VaTechE36 View Post
    Sigh...you must not be good at reading or something...if you want to specs go buy the suspension kit and get all the assistance that comes along with purchasing from bimmerworld.
    Harsh!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3
    I'm definitely playing Little League here John, 2 sets of AST's? Damn...

    I'm a little torn about picking up the MCS', I'd given myself hard time goals to hit before I was going to let myself spend the cash for better suspension. At the same time it doesn't make sense to wait, then pay a whole bunch more later....
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Springfield, IL
    Posts
    2,493
    My Cars
    '95m3(Avus)/996tt/4.8is
    There will always be another set available Doc when your ready to make the jump. The money pit NEVER ends for possible upgrades, and it wasn't too long ago when you were suffering under all of the $$$ to get the car up to speed. No need to self inflict anything now!

    Enjoy your well sorted car and realize there is ALWAYS going to be better/faster/nicer st*$ out there. Doesn't make the track time any more enjoyable.....

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3
    True, plus I'm not through doing the maintenance on mine yet. I have a box full of ball joints/bushings waiting for me to rebuild the front control arms. Then I'll have gone through the entire car pretty much.

    Also I did just blow a wad of cash on a used set of front/rear Stoptech BBK that popped up locally a few months ago too. Thought that was too good to pass up for sure, as I'd been looking for a used Stoptech kit for months...

    A few small odds and ends remain after that but nothing that impacts the way anything really works. (Like I need to replace the broken center hvac vent and figure out why the keyless entry isn't working)
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    2,538
    My Cars
    e28, Spec3, M3, M3, ZHP
    You could use that money to keep the car running and get more track time to get you down to those hard time targets =)
    Andrew Elmore

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Parker, Colorado
    Posts
    3,128
    My Cars
    GTS3 E36, 97 M3/4/5
    Quote Originally Posted by DocWyte View Post
    I'm definitely playing Little League here John, 2 sets of AST's? Damn...
    I got hit twice last year... both times breaking a strut. I now carry a full set of replacements in the trailer. The 4200s aren't known for being extremely robust in w2w scenarios... so it's cheap(er) insurance

    I'm a little torn about picking up the MCS', I'd given myself hard time goals to hit before I was going to let myself spend the cash for better suspension. At the same time it doesn't make sense to wait, then pay a whole bunch more later....
    The price is about 1k short of what a new set costs from some vendors, minus the mounts which you already have. It's a good deal.... but not a great deal. At $2k we wouldn't be having this conversation

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,343
    My Cars
    '98 M3
    John, gotcha. The 4200's are more delicate than Koni's, MCS' etc? Weird.

    Hear you on the price, I was thinking much the same. I may end up skipping these for this year as I bought the stoptechs. Keep me in mind for a set of the 4200's when you're ready to sell them.
    '03 911 Turbo 6MT fun car
    '18 Toyota Land Cruiser Daily driver/Ski Machine/Off Roader
    '15 Cayenne Diesel Wife's DD
    '17 KTM 690 "Adv" 2 wheeled Adventurer

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    8,162
    My Cars
    '97 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by VaTechE36 View Post
    Sigh...you must not be good at reading or something...if you want to specs go buy the suspension kit and get all the assistance that comes along with purchasing from bimmerworld.
    Thank you for your very helpful post. I apologize dearly for only scanning this thread and missing the part about only being helpful to their customers that have bought the product from them. Unfortunately I don't feel that it would be financially viable for me to sell my set of MCS doubles to again purchase them again from Bimmerworld. I purchased the MCS doubles from Vorshlag as I had been dealing with them for years with my AST 4200's and they had given me a decent deal as a result. I also purchase parts from Bimmerworld.

    Bimmerworld's position on sharing information can go two ways. Some people might go to them because they will share basic set up info if you buy from them, some might think that their attitude about sharing basic set up info is rude compared to the next reseller that will help out anyone that calls them. We are just talking base settings here.
    Last edited by chikinhed; 01-25-2017 at 07:46 PM.
    '97 M3, Estoril blue, 2 dr, euro 6-spd, EFR 9180 divided T4 .92 IWG, RK tuning, CP 8.5:1 pistons, Eagle rods, Schrick cams, L19 11 mm ARP studs, O-ringed block, Supertech stainless/inconel valves, Supertech springs & Ti retainers, ported head, S54 oil pump/pan, 80 lb. injectors, OBD1 intake manifold, Steedspeed twin scroll T4, 3.5" SS exhaust, eBoost2 EBC, HFS-4 W/M injection, AEM Failsafe, Zeitronix data logger, Racelogic TC, OpenOBC w. ethanol %, Ireland Eng. engine mounts, UUC black tranny mounts w. enforcers, UUC twin disc feramic, ARC-8's, MCS 2-ways, Z3 rack, Rallyroad strut bar, X brace, Eibach sway bars, Ground Control LCAB bushings, Bimmerworld RTAB's, Powerflex subframe bushings, 210 4-clutch LSD, Stoptech BBK, titainium shims, steel braided lines, brake cooling ducts.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    1,796
    My Cars
    95 M3 & Legacy Manwagon
    Ask Terry at Vorshlag if they have any set up guides, since you bought the set from them?

    The initial settings direct from MCS (downloadable from their website and are 8R 4C from soft) work fairly well IMO. Bimmerworld's settings are also just a baseline to be adjusted from.
    "Fear disturbs your concentration" -Sabine Schmit

    1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54 + Mk60 DSC, California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
    1998 BMW M3/4/5 Alpine/Modena, Z3 Rack, otherwise stock-- DD without burbles
    2017 Chevy SS, Orange Blast Metallic, 6MT -- DD with burbles

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    2,538
    My Cars
    e28, Spec3, M3, M3, ZHP
    First off, my apologies for the tone...I was just assuming you were fishing for information people have paid a lot of money to get. Had you put in that much detail in your original post giving some background, you could have gotten more helpful information, but your single sentence question came off a bit misleading. Since you provided some additional details, you got a more helpful answer from Bimmerman535i which should hopefully point you in the right direction.

    You could also try calling BW and asking, but I wouldn't hold my breath because I'm assuming they've put a lot of time and energy into coming up with some good baseline settings based on their experience that is an added bonus when decided who to purchase equipment from.

    Either way, good luck, my apologies again for the harshness, and enjoy your baller suspension =)
    Andrew Elmore

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. How much better off are forum members than your average car driver?
    By Aestheticus in forum General BMW and Automotive Discussion sponsored by Intercity Lines
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-28-2014, 07:21 PM
  2. Just how much better does a car age if parked in a garage? A little? A lot?
    By OnTheFence in forum General BMW and Automotive Discussion sponsored by Intercity Lines
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-11-2012, 05:40 PM
  3. So how much slower are used HooHoo's?
    By snk328is in forum Track, Auto-X & Drag Racing sponsored by Bimmerparts.com
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-08-2009, 01:18 PM
  4. Exactly how much stiffer are H&R Race vs Sport Springs???
    By Danny318 in forum 1991 - 1999 (E36)
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 10-27-2007, 04:01 PM
  5. How Much Better Are Today's Tires?
    By Low Level in forum Tire & Wheel Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2007, 11:24 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •