Recently someone told me a ZF or Getrag manual transmission in a BMW is more akin to a Mustang's T5. Considering people break those things with stock power, it seems very hard to see the truth in that.
Last edited by Liquidity; 12-09-2016 at 03:21 PM.
Seems like most people in the 5-600whp range have no problems with the zf 5 speed.
I bet it has a ton to do with traction. Really sticky tires and drag racing and you'll break more easily. A super quick spooling turbo will put more stress on your trans.
With street tires, the zf 5 speed has held 800+ without problem..
I think torque is a bigger factor here. 700wtq is the number id guess.
And agreed weight is a huge facor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1989 535i - sold
1999 M3 Tiag/Dove - sold
1998 M3 Turbo Arctic/black - current
2004 Built motor TiAg/Black - Sold
2008 E61 19T Turbo-Wagon - current
2011 E82 135i - S85 Swap - current
1998 M3 Cosmos S54 swapped Sedan - current
1998 Turbo: PTE6870 | 1.15 ar | Hp Cover, Custom Divided T4 bottom-mount, 3.5" SS exhaust, Dual Turbosmart Compgates, Turbosmart Raceport BOV, 3.5" Treadstone Intercooler, 3.5" Vibrant resonator and muffler, Arp 2k Headstuds | Arp 2k Main studs | 87mm Je pistons | Eagle rods | 9.2:1 static compression, Ces 87mm cutring, Custom solid rear subframe bushings, Akg 85d diff bushings, 4 clutch 3.15 diff, , Poly engine mounts, UUC trans mounts W/ enforcers, 22RPD OBD2 Stock ECU id1700 E85 tune, 22RPD Big power Transmission swap w/ GS6-53
I broke one with rear wheel torque in the 500 - 600 lb range. They are pretty reliable to more than twice their 320 NM or 236 ft lb at the crank rating. Stay off the drag strip, use street tires not R compounds, and it should hold even more for a while. If you have big torque, find a spare.
I'd say wheel hop is also going to be a factor in driveline life. Damn you wheel hop (shakes fist in air).
'97 M3, Estoril blue, 2 dr, euro 6-spd, EFR 9180 divided T4 .92 IWG, RK tuning, CP 8.5:1 pistons, Eagle rods, Schrick cams, L19 11 mm ARP studs, O-ringed block, Supertech stainless/inconel valves, Supertech springs & Ti retainers, ported head, S54 oil pump/pan, 80 lb. injectors, OBD1 intake manifold, Steedspeed twin scroll T4, 3.5" SS exhaust, eBoost2 EBC, HFS-4 W/M injection, AEM Failsafe, Zeitronix data logger, Racelogic TC, OpenOBC w. ethanol %, Ireland Eng. engine mounts, UUC black tranny mounts w. enforcers, UUC twin disc feramic, ARC-8's, MCS 2-ways, Z3 rack, Rallyroad strut bar, X brace, Eibach sway bars, Ground Control LCAB bushings, Bimmerworld RTAB's, Powerflex subframe bushings, 210 4-clutch LSD, Stoptech BBK, titainium shims, steel braided lines, brake cooling ducts.
Oh wow well that's much more than a T5. People put the limit of the T5 around 400 - and that's only if you baby it, no hard shifts, smooth launches. Very good information to have. Thank you.
Okay, I'm writing here because Liquidity felt the need to PM me and then block my reply.
Dear Liquidity, please tell me you didn't go through all that effort just to "prove" me wrong/make yourself feel better?Originally Posted by Liquidity
By the replies I gather that the stated torque limit (highly dependent on vehicle weight and tires) is "pretty reliable to more than twice their 320 NM or 236 ft lb at the crank rating" (~450-500). Higher torque numbers involved "street tires" and care (or to use your words "that's only if you baby it, no hard shifts, smooth launches").
I've personally seen a T5 live behind a 450 ft/lb small block Ford, but ehhh... after being presented with more info I'm willing to agree the BMW trans is stronger than a T5. When I made my "comparable to a T5, I went off of the listed torque rating. With that said, your statement that the BMW transmissions are "built like tanks" isn't by any means valid based on the responses here.
So Mr Liquidity, personally, I'll keep my T56 (having personally stressed one with 650 ft/lb in a 3400lb car with slicks).... but then I'm a "T56 fan boy"
As others said in your thread (before you deleted it), you really need to toughen up (I'd say grow up). You acted (and continue to act) like a little kid. You got butthurt, threw a tantrum, and deleted your thread because others agreed your decision to use a BMW transmission (behind an LSx) instead of a T56 was not the best choice. I'll be sure to watch for your next iteration.
Last edited by V8Z4; 12-13-2016 at 09:14 PM.
Chris
Liquidity seems like someone who takes internet car forums too seriously. From what I read in that thread and this thread, I doubt one trans is much better than the other. I am one of those guys who has had a ZF320 behind a 500lb rwtq turbo S52 for 6 years, and broken one during that time. However, I am considering a T56 Magnum (Ford version) now that I should be over 600 lbs rwtq. There are certainly a lot more Ford hotrodders than BMW hotrodders, and I often look at what the domestics are doing.
What's funny is nobody told Liquidity he was "wrong" to use a BMW transmission behind an LSx, just that there were lots of reasons not to do it.
Chris
Powerglide > or any automatic for that reason. Manuel transmission is for fun factor if you want speed (time slips) you need an auto.
Yeah but who's ready to drop 10K into a transmission. That's the starting point....pretty much excluded to professional race teams. Although I would love to have one (to race) maybe not daily.
Last edited by Mklock; 12-14-2016 at 12:50 AM.
Yeah I think I have a good idea, as why I said to race hehe. Watched way to much rally to listen to that every day.
Oh come on, it's only money...priorities.jpg ... j/k
That's been everyone's response to Liquidity's decision. Yeah it will "work" but (by his own account) it's going to cost him almost as much as having bought a T56 and he is going to have some issues. At a minimum he is going to need to figure out how to add a VSS for the GM ECU. Others mentioned that the location of the engine will likely be different (when compared to a T56 build) so headers and motor mounts are likely to be custom, and he may well run into crossmember fitment issues. So in the end, it's unlikely he will manage to make it work (the guy complained about the cost of buying a T56 transmission mount so it doesn't sound like he has the ability to build his own).
Last edited by V8Z4; 12-14-2016 at 09:33 AM.
Chris
My t56 was fun until about the 3rd broken diff and 2.2 60fts.
Sold that POS and bought my self a th400. yeehaw boys.
328i Sedan Twin s366's, 6.0LS, TH400, MS3 Ultimate
9.20 at 150 on 22psi
all medium cases. th400 because i want a reverse manual valve body and trans brake.
Im also doing a big case swap this winter too
328i Sedan Twin s366's, 6.0LS, TH400, MS3 Ultimate
9.20 at 150 on 22psi
how does the 400 fit in the E36? I had to hammer a little bit on the firewall on mine and had to cut away some of the stock trans mount rail on the passenger side. No room for a blanket though without more cutting.
1996 332IS
Built 3.2
CES/Steed TS Precision 6466, spraying a "$π!℅" load of meth.
Technique Tuning 80# tune.
1/4 mile 10.84 @ 136.72
Your 1 and only stop for all your BMW performance needs
WWW.CESMOTORSPORT.COM
Fits good. Better then the t56. No beating, or no more then the t56 and i cant remember if i had to for the t56.
The t56, you had to have the bell housing on the motor when installing the swap (making it so the motor has to come out to do a clutch), but the TH400 can be installed with the motor in the car. So far it fits better then the t56.
Im currently switching over to a virgin chassis, so ill know soon if i have to smash some things to make it fit, but i dont think i will have to.
But i might smash things anyways just to make it seem more difficult. Who doesnt like smashing things?
328i Sedan Twin s366's, 6.0LS, TH400, MS3 Ultimate
9.20 at 150 on 22psi
Bookmarks