Agreed^.
Also, regarding this transmission's inherent strength or weakness. It is a derivative of a tried and true GM design, albeit at it's torque capacity, built by the frogs and all this compounded by BMWs recommendation NOT to change the trans oil.
Given good care it's just fine. I'm not going to mention the mileage on the wife's example so as not to jinx myself.
Ahhh, found it. Coincidentally, almost one year after identifying the part the same happened to me. http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...Fffffuuuuuuuuu!!
OP, what ended up happening with the tranny?
1992 525iT, Manual Swap, Bilstien Sport struts, H&R springs, Style 32 17" wheels (17x8 fronts, 17x9 rears), ACS exhaust, Euro cluster, Wilwood SL6R BBK on E38 rotors
OP's last activity was almost a year ago to the day. I would wager the tranny died and he sold the car for scrap.
Bump it again. What happened to your tranny? Did it eventually brake?
I have same problem.. https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...7#post29806157
5 years later... I now believe most of the stories are probably from people who change the fluid after the trans started showing symptoms of failure, and then it died. Not necessarily caused by the fluid change.
It would be the same as new oil messing up your engine.... if you went 100k miles on the same engine oil, like people often do with transmission oil. Changing the engine oil after 100k miles (if it could even make it that long) would almost certainly dislodge enough crud to block up the oil intake.
I still think changing the trans oil sooner than later is worth the potential risk, it's not like you can change it all at once anyway. If you already have symptoms though, don't assume new fluid will save it. Although it often does.
Bookmarks