M3 with headers and cat back mods only.
Oh I bet it was hard to contain yourself!
^ yeah, but i am glad it is over with and i am officially enjoying this car.
Hehe.. Nice inspection story. You are lucky that you only have to do it once every 2 years too
- 96 328is 6.0L. (LS1 to LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ad.php?2098938)
- 96 328is 5.7L. (LS1 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1289987)
- 95 ///M3 6.0L. (LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1619249)
- 97 ///M3. (e46 Fender Flares/track car build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1727098)
- 96 328is (Dual Fuel Pump to Surge Tank thread: http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh...ad.php?1964025)
Now you need those same guys to be there next time around...
ar design stage 1 turbo kit - 11.7 @ 127mph 12psi of boost..... 5300ft elevation E36 S50 stock long block w/ARP
sales@ardesign.info | tel. 303.351.3515| www.ardesign.info
Powering some of the world's fastest BMWs
How well are engine vibrations, etc, isolated with this install? Is it close to a stock E36? I like your install of the LS1, but I would really like to know what he NVH is like compared to stock.
You definitely get more N & V, but not H
There is more vibration than stock, because you are replacing your engine with the one twice your size in displacement and add 2 more cylinders. The vibrations are nothing crazy, but definitely increased and even rock your car when you rev it as it does in the origin of the engine.
Noise has obviously increased from stock, because of reason above plus aftermarket exhaust set up and muffler. This part really depends on your preferences and likings. There are hundreds of options for exhaust. You can make it as loud or as quite as you want.
Both vibrations emitted and current sound it makes are nothing disturbing, but instead very pleasing. It is very close to C6 Vett with exhaust note a little bit louder. And I'm comparing with C6 Vett, because I've driven this for quite a while
- 96 328is 6.0L. (LS1 to LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ad.php?2098938)
- 96 328is 5.7L. (LS1 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1289987)
- 95 ///M3 6.0L. (LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1619249)
- 97 ///M3. (e46 Fender Flares/track car build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1727098)
- 96 328is (Dual Fuel Pump to Surge Tank thread: http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh...ad.php?1964025)
^ I hate you.
You suck!
'97 M3/4
I respect & admire you for succeeding at life
i gota ask, how dose the acceleration of your car compare to the c6?
The C6 was sold for some time now, but from what I remember (Boriksh's) car was about the same on initial acceleration, but then aerodynamics come into play. I think C6 would've won up top eventhough e36 has long tubes and exhaust... May be Borik will do a race with c6 at one point and let us know.
My e36 is 5.7 and is NOTICEABLY slower than 6.0.
- 96 328is 6.0L. (LS1 to LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ad.php?2098938)
- 96 328is 5.7L. (LS1 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1289987)
- 95 ///M3 6.0L. (LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1619249)
- 97 ///M3. (e46 Fender Flares/track car build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1727098)
- 96 328is (Dual Fuel Pump to Surge Tank thread: http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh...ad.php?1964025)
As a point of reference I did some baseline dynos on a dynojet with my car and got 308whp and 313tq on a basically stock LS1 m3. What type of numbers do you think the 6.0 m3 produce?Originally Posted by bimerok
Clueless... With exhaust and a tune maybe ~440 - 450 crank??? Never cared about the numbers. I like the feel of the pants more than anything...
- 96 328is 6.0L. (LS1 to LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ad.php?2098938)
- 96 328is 5.7L. (LS1 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1289987)
- 95 ///M3 6.0L. (LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1619249)
- 97 ///M3. (e46 Fender Flares/track car build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1727098)
- 96 328is (Dual Fuel Pump to Surge Tank thread: http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh...ad.php?1964025)
Thats a good question. The GTO gearbox has a lower first gear compared to the FBody T56. The M12 (T56 in the GTO) would probably add a distinct advantage on the launch with that 3.23 and the light weight of the car. The M12 also has closer ratios in 1st through 3rd, though I'm not too sure about 5th and 6th.
In my GTO, especially since I had the LS3 installed, first gear is almost too low. I've been thinking about sourcing the earlier transmission myself.
Last edited by Chuck; 09-29-2011 at 04:14 AM.
I am not sure what your T56 is out of, but in the T56 I got out of a 2006 GTO, all gear ratios (except 4th) are different from the F-body trans.
- 96 328is 6.0L. (LS1 to LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ad.php?2098938)
- 96 328is 5.7L. (LS1 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1289987)
- 95 ///M3 6.0L. (LS2 build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1619249)
- 97 ///M3. (e46 Fender Flares/track car build thread: http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1727098)
- 96 328is (Dual Fuel Pump to Surge Tank thread: http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh...ad.php?1964025)
Bookmarks