Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 52

Thread: How much horsepower does a E36 M3 have stock?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    29
    My Cars
    '99 323i

    How much horsepower does a E36 M3 have stock?

    How much horsepower does a E36 M3 have stock?


    Thanks,

    Frank

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    4,928
    My Cars
    '09 Mini Cooper
    i think its 240.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    29
    My Cars
    '99 323i
    Thanks!

    Frank

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley,CA - (SoCaL)
    Posts
    4,177
    My Cars
    Yamaha R6, Avus E36, MBZ C230
    depends... if its a 95 with a 3.0L OBD-I Engine it has 240hp (like mine) .. but if its a 96-99 with a 3.2L OBD-II then i beleive it has 280hp stock! 3:

    -phill F.- 10/95 Avus E36


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    D/FW
    Posts
    710
    My Cars
    Just the ///M3
    95's are rated at 240 BHP
    96-99 are rated at 240 BHP

    Both are the same, yet the 3.2L's put out a little bit more torque due to its bigger stroke

    95 Dakar ///M3
    TMS Intake and Euro HFM Kit , TrackPipe, UUC System U Exhaust, Clutch Stop, BMP Strut Bar, BMP slotted front rotors, UUC Sway Barbarians , Mb highs, Fosgate mids and 3 Fosgate H2 10's. *Painted moldings not pictured*

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Corona, CA
    Posts
    8,886
    My Cars
    99 M3
    Originally posted by phillyB///M3
    depends... if its a 95 with a 3.0L OBD-I Engine it has 240hp (like mine) .. but if its a 96-99 with a 3.2L OBD-II then i beleive it has 280hp stock! 3:

    i wish

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,252
    My Cars
    '07 M Z4 Roadster
    The european M3 3.0 has 286HP/236TQ, while the GT has 295HP/238TQ. The M3 3.2 has 321HP/258TQ; there was no special stock edition of this model. Fast cars.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    san diego
    Posts
    1,862
    My Cars
    97 BMW M3, 08 VW Rabbit S
    96-99 stock has 240, redlines at 6500

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    2,556
    My Cars
    BMW-Less
    Originally posted by EB ///M3
    Actually these are the real #'s

    '95-'98 E36 M3 has 240hp ('95-3.0L and 96-99 3.2L)
    '99 E36 M3 has 270hp

    Don't quote me but i'm pretty sure

    If that makes you feel better . . .

    They all have 240 HP in U.S. Spec.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    15,304
    My Cars
    TBSS, 90 348, 65 Mustang
    All have 240, but many people have said that the 3.2Ls have more HP then what's advertised.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    raleigh, nc
    Posts
    834
    My Cars
    99 m3 coupe
    i've dynoed tons of e36 m3s, in stock and modded form. i've seen them make anywhere from 195 to 220 in bone stock trim on my dynapack, so it's just the luck of the draw i guess.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    11,585
    My Cars
    1
    Wow. It surprises me to hear so many people who are under false assumptions with regard to the hp ratings of these engines.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, Jawja
    Posts
    18,744
    My Cars
    E36 | E55 Wagon | W126
    I thought mine had 180.
    Geordie Johnston - E36 Collector.


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Still in Seattle
    Posts
    5,807
    My Cars
    95 M3, 05 F-150 STX
    Wow. It surprises me to hear so many people who are under false assumptions with regard to the hp ratings of these engines.
    My thoughts exactly.:

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    29
    My Cars
    '99 323i
    Thanks everyone!! This was very helpful!!

    Frank

  16. #16
    Def's Avatar
    Def is offline Lead Disagreement Eng PE
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    13,547
    My Cars
    SW22, Volt
    I'm still of the opinion that the 3.2L motor puts out a bit more HP than the 3.0L motor, but BMWNA didn't want to piss off '95 owners by rating it higher. So they just rated them the same.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    15,304
    My Cars
    TBSS, 90 348, 65 Mustang
    They are all the same. Even the torque is the same.
    No

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    488
    My Cars
    NX2000, Infiniti G20, Honda Civic
    ???
    I would be really pissed if my 3.2 had 180 Hspwr. Do you have a link to this.

    Are we all talking to the flywheel?
    2007 Infiniti G35 Coupe
    1990 Acura Integra LS

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    3,083
    My Cars
    '95 Subaru C5 M3 VIII
    Heh, he was joking...

    Originally posted by EB ///M3
    They are all the same. Even the torque is the same.
    From all the dyno sheets Ive seen the 3.2's always make more TQ than HP with the 3.0's being the opposite. It's even rated at more by BMW, 225 and 236, if memory serves.

    And I must say this is a bit frightening. Maybe we should have a "Get to know your M3" class.
    '05 Big Winged RICECAR

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    813
    My Cars
    2005 ZHP
    I agree. It's like people look at the ratings put out by BMW and it just doesnt sink in. Maybe if our cars had around 88 hp it would be easier...only two digits to remember and it doesnt matter if you mix them up.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    15,304
    My Cars
    TBSS, 90 348, 65 Mustang
    I don't care how much power my car has, it has a Roundel and therefore is better then any car ever made.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    813
    My Cars
    2005 ZHP
    well put, john. the roundel makes a car above average, but the ///M badge makes the car unbelieveable.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Chi-town
    Posts
    135
    My Cars
    E90 325xi
    LOL, What I mean is BMW supposedly says they are the same but there is some gains in both hp and torque they don't tell you about between the 3.0 and the 3.2

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Newark, DE
    Posts
    125
    My Cars
    See Sig
    frank999....

    Check my sig for the number on my '99. These #'s are at the wheel from a dyno run this past June. The only mod's at the time of this dyno run were a stock replacement K&N air filter. My baby had about 35k miles on her clock at that time
    '04 325xi, Silver Gray Metallic/Black (our new addition to the family )
    '99 M3, TitanSilver/Black - Stock for now . . . (214 rwhp, 223 rwt)
    '96 328is, Boston Green/Beige - SOLD !! (7/12/2003 - $10,000 :-)
    '97 Toyota Tacoma XtraCab, Green

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    11,585
    My Cars
    1
    Originally posted by EB ///M3
    LOL, What I mean is BMW supposedly says they are the same but there is some gains in both hp and torque they don't tell you about between the 3.0 and the 3.2
    Sorry. You really should've given up while you were only slightly behind...

    BMW reports the following figures for the US-spec E36 M3s:

    1995: HP = 240 bhp, TQ = 225 ft-lb

    1996 - 1999: HP = 240 bhp, TQ = 236 ft-lb

    So, while they do claim the hp figures are identical from 3.0L to 3.2L, they make no such claim with regard to the torque figures for the two iterations of the S5x engine.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •